Manuscript Detail

View Revisions

Love, J., Kisker, E., Ross, C. M., Schochet, P. Z., Brooks-Gunn, J., Paulsell, D., et al. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families: The impacts of Early Head Start. Volumes I-III: Final technical report [and] appendixes [and] local contributions to understanding the programs and their impacts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start Bureau.

Additional sources:

WWHV004198

Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 885–901. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.885
Manuscript screening details
Screening decision Screening conclusion HomVEE procedures and standards version
Passes screens Eligible for review Version 1
Study design details
Rating Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Compromised randomization Confounding factors Valid, reliable measure(s)
High Randomized controlled trial Low Established on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status; Established on many relevant outcomes None None Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed before 2021
Notes:

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to remove mother's partnership status/family structure findings from the Family Economic Self-Sufficiency domain because ACF determined that mother's partnership status is ineligible for review by HomVEE.

footnote38

Submitted by user on

The study expressed some effect sizes as a percentage of the standard deviation. To be consistent with other studies, HomVEE divided the study-reported effect size by 100 and rounded to two decimal places.

footnote176

Submitted by user on

This study received a mixed rating. Outcomes from the Parent Services Interview have low attrition and typically receive a high rating (though some outcomes that were assessable at baseline and not controlled receive a moderate rating). Outcomes from the Child Assessment (Bayley) and Parent/Child Interactions have high attrition, but baseline equivalence is established and those outcomes receive a moderate rating. Outcomes from the 36-month parent interview have high attrition, but baseline equivalence was established so they generally rate moderate, although outcomes on maternal health and male/father presence were assessable and not controlled, and therefore rate low.

Study characteristics
Study participants This study relies on data from a randomized controlled trial of 17 Early Head Start (EHS) programs that began in 1995. Seven of the programs served clients through a home-based option (though other clients in other EHS options also received home visits) and are the focus of this report (EHS-HBO). The study randomly assigned 1,385 families, who applied to those 7 programs, either to receive home-based EHS or a comparison condition. This study included outcomes reported for the 3-year-old follow-up (other years of follow-up are reported in separate studies). For this follow-up, 950 parents (502 in EHS-HBO and 448 in the comparison group) provided data for parent interviews. Among parent interview participants, 46 percent were white, 25 percent were black, and 26 percent were Hispanic. One in four parents had more than a high school education, and one in 10 were in families living above the poverty line; one-third to one-half of families were receiving welfare (AFDC) or Food Stamps.
Setting The study was conducted in 17 EHS programs throughout the United States, including 7 programs with home-based options, which are the focus of this report. Four programs were located in urban areas and three programs were located in rural areas. The seven programs represented a mix of implementation timing; one early implementer had all EHS-HBO elements in place by 1997, and three later implementers had all elements in place by 1999; three programs did not have all elements in place by 1999. The early-implementing program had fully implemented both child and family development services early and continued to have those services in place in 1999.
Intervention services EHS-HBO services are intended to be delivered to study families via weekly home visits. Seventy percent of families in these programs received weekly visits during at least one of the first two follow-up periods, and 26 percent received such services throughout both periods. Over the first two years, families in the home-based option received an average of 71 visits. Typical home visits are at least one hour long. Topics for home visits included child growth and development, child play activities, housing issues, and parent-child communication.
Comparison conditions Control group families could not receive EHS-HBO services, but could receive other services available in their community.
Subgroups examined This field lists subgroups examined in the manuscript (even if they were not replicated in other samples and not reported on the summary page for this model’s report).
Subgroups are not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021.
Funding sources Administration for Children and Families (ACF), the Child Outcomes Research and Evaluation team (CORE)within ACF’s Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE), and the Head Start Bureau in the Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF)
Author affiliation None of the study authors are developers of this model.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed status is not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021.

Findings that rate moderate or high

Child development and school readiness
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Moderate Bayley BRS: Orientation/Engagement
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 3.90 Adjusted mean = 3.80 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 3.40 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Bayley Behavioral Rating Scale(BRS): Emotional regulation
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.00 Adjusted mean = 4.00 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 2.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Bayley Mental DevelopmentIndex(MDI)Standard Score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 746 children Adjusted mean = 94.10 Adjusted mean = 92.80 Mean difference = 1.20 Study reported = 9.50 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Child behavior checklist - aggressive behavior
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 746 children Adjusted mean = 11.20 Adjusted mean = 11.70 Mean difference = -0.50 Study reported = -7.80 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Engagement of parent during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 5.10 Adjusted mean = 5.00 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 5.60 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Engagement of parent during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.80 Adjusted mean = 4.60 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 19.20 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Moderate Frustration during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 2.70 Adjusted mean = 2.60 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 5.90 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Negativity toward parent during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.30 Adjusted mean = 1.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -6.60 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT)-III Standard Score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 746 children Adjusted mean = 84.60 Adjusted mean = 83.10 Mean difference = 1.50 Study reported = 9.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage with PPVT-III<85
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 746 children % = 45.60 % = 48.60 = -3.00 Study reported = -6.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage with MDI <85
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 746 children % = 20.50 % = 22.00 = -1.40 Study reported = -3.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Persistence during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.70 Adjusted mean = 4.60 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 12.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Sustained attention with objects during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 5.00 Adjusted mean = 4.90 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 10.60 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Child health
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Any child health services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 100.00 % = 99.80 = 0.20 Not Applicable Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any dentist visits
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 27.10 % = 28.10 = -1.00 HomVEE calculated = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any doctor visits
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 99.00 % = 98.70 = 0.30 HomVEE calculated = 0.16 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any emergency room visits
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 53.40 % = 56.00 = -2.60 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any immunizations
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 99.10 % = 98.50 = 0.70 HomVEE calculated = 0.31 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any screening tests
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 62.40 % = 61.00 = 1.40 HomVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Child’s health status
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 4.00 Adjusted mean = 4.00 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of children in fair or poor health
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample Age 3 950 children % = 9.80 % = 9.60 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Family economic self-sufficiency
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Average hours per week employed
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 14.80 Adjusted mean = 15.10 Mean difference = -0.30 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Average hours per week in any employment, education, or training activity
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 19.90 Adjusted mean = 18.50 Mean difference = 1.40 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Average hours per week in education or training
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.50 Adjusted mean = 3.00 Mean difference = 1.50 Study reported = -0.24 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
High Employed: 1st quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 33.80 % = 36.10 = -2.30 Study reported = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 2nd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 38.20 % = 42.90 = -4.70 Study reported = 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 3rd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 46.90 % = 50.10 = -3.20 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 4th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 51.90 % = 51.70 = 0.20 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 5th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 57.70 % = 58.90 = -1.20 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 6th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 61.70 % = 58.20 = 3.50 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 7th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 57.50 % = 55.00 = 2.50 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employed: 8th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 55.90 % = 59.90 = -4.00 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 1st quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 47.30 % = 48.40 = -1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 2nd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 53.40 % = 55.50 = -2.10 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 3rd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 62.30 % = 62.90 = -0.60 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 4th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 65.20 % = 61.60 = 3.60 Study reported = -0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 5th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 69.60 % = 67.90 = 1.70 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 6th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 72.90 % = 66.40 = 6.50 Study reported = -0.14 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 7th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 66.40 % = 62.70 = 3.70 Study reported = -0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Employment, education, or training: 8th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 65.20 % = 66.60 = -14.00 Study reported = 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Ever employed
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 83.10 % = 81.80 = 1.30 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Ever employed or in education/training
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 90.50 % = 88.90 = 1.60 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Ever in education or training
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 53.10 % = 45.50 = 7.60 Study reported = -0.15 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
High Ever received AFDC or TANF
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 55.20 % = 52.50 = 2.70 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Ever received food stamps
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers = 66.70 = 65.40 = 1.30 Study reported = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Ever received welfare
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers = 72.90 = 70.50 = 2.40 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Have GED
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 8.50 % = 11.50 = 3.00 Study reported = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Have high school diploma
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 49.10 % = 45.70 = 3.40 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High In education or training: 1st quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 21.20 % = 21.60 = -0.40 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High In education or training: 2nd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 25.10 % = 22.90 = 2.20 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High In education or training: 3rd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 28.20 % = 26.50 = 1.70 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High In education or training: 4th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 27.10 % = 22.50 = 4.60 Study reported = -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High In education or training: 5th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 28.60 % = 22.90 = 5.70 Study reported = -0.13 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
High In education or training: 6th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 28.70 % = 21.30 = 7.40 Study reported = -0.18 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
High In education or training: 7th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 23.10 % = 17.60 = 5.50 Study reported = -0.14 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
High In education or training: 8th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 24.30 % = 15.60 = 8.70 Study reported = -0.22 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
High Income above poverty line, (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean % = 41.10 Adjusted mean % = 40.80 Mean difference = 0.30 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 1st quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 42.20 % = 29.40 = 12.80 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 2nd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 41.90 % = 42.40 = -0.50 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 3rd quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 46.20 % = 43.90 = 2.30 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 4th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 37.20 % = 38.10 = -0.90 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 5th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 36.00 % = 37.80 = -1.80 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 6th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 36.40 % = 38.50 = -2.10 Study reported = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 7th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 27.40 % = 32.10 = -4.70 Study reported = 0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Received AFDC or TANF: 8th quarter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 27.80 % = 27.80 = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Total AFDC or TANF benefits ($)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers = 2675.50 = 2833.80 = -158.30 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Total food stamps benefits ($)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 2297.80 Adjusted mean = 2152.50 Mean difference = 145.30 Study reported = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Total welfare benefits ($)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 5928.60 Adjusted mean = 6088.80 Mean difference = -160.20 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Ever in ESL class
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 3.40 % = 2.40 = 1.00 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Ever in high school
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 12.60 % = 6.80 = 5.80 Study reported = -0.20 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Moderate Ever in vocational program
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 18.20 % = 15.70 = 2.50 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Linkages and referrals
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Any family health services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 100.00 % = 100.00 = 0.00 Not Applicable Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Any family mental health services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 23.90 % = 21.00 = 2.90 HomVEE calculated = 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Identification of child’s disability
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 7.60 % = 5.00 = 2.70 HomVEE calculated = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Services for child with disability
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 5.30 % = 3.70 Mean difference = 1.50 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Any education-related services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 86.90 % = 50.80 = 36.10 HomVEE calculated = 1.13 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Moderate Any employment-related services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 77.30 % = 47.10 = 30.20 HomVEE calculated = 0.81 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Moderate Housing assistance
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 65.70 % = 64.10 = 1.60 HomVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Transportation assistance
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 32.00 % = 23.90 = 8.10 HomVEE calculated = 0.24 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Maternal health
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Subsequent birth by 24 months after random assignment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample 28 months after assignment 941 mothers % = 21.80 % = 24.70 Mean difference = -2.90 Study reported = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate FES: Family conflict
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample 36 months postpartum 950 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.70 Adjusted mean = 1.70 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate PSI Parent-Child dysfunctional interaction
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample 36 months postpartum 950 mothers Adjusted mean = 17.50 Adjusted mean = 18.10 Mean difference = -0.60 Study reported = -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate PSI Parental distress
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact sample 36 months postpartum 950 mothers Adjusted mean = 24.90 Adjusted mean = 26.30 Mean difference = -1.40 Study reported = -0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Positive parenting practices
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Moderate HOME harshness
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 0.30 Adjusted mean = 0.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate HOME internal physical environment
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 8.00 Adjusted mean = 8.00 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate HOME total score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 28.30 Adjusted mean = 28.10 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate HOME warmth
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 2.70 Adjusted mean = 2.70 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate HOME: support of language and learning
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 10.90 Adjusted mean = 10.70 Mean difference = 0.20 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Detachment during parent-child puzzle challenge tasks
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.60 Adjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Detachment during parent-child semi-structured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.20 Adjusted mean = 1.30 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Index of severity of discipline strategies
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children Adjusted mean = 3.30 Adjusted mean = 3.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Intrusiveness during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 2.50 Adjusted mean = 2.60 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Intrusiveness during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.60 Adjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Negative regard during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 1.20 Adjusted mean = 1.30 Mean difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Parent-child play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.40 Adjusted mean = 4.40 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of children that follow a bedtime routine
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children % = 72.00 % = 71.00 = 1.00 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of children with a regular bedtime
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children % = 59.30 % = 55.60 = 3.70 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents suggesting physical punishment as a discipline strategy
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children = 44.90 = 44.50 = 0.40 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents that read to child at bedtime
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children % = 29.60 % = 25.80 = 3.80 Study reported = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents that read to child daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children % = 54.50 % = 55.70 = -1.20 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents that spanked child in the past week
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children % = 44.10 % = 49.60 = -5.50 Study reported = -0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents that usually use a car seat correctly
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children = 70.40 = 69.40 = 1.00 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Percentage of parents that would use mild discipline only
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 950 children = 45.80 = 45.90 = -0.10 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Quality of assistance during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 3.60 Adjusted mean = 3.50 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Supportive presence during parent-child puzzle challenge task
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.60 Adjusted mean = 4.50 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Moderate Supportiveness during parent-child semistructured play
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study Age 3 744 children Adjusted mean = 4.00 Adjusted mean = 3.90 Mean difference = 0.10 Study reported = 0.16 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Reductions in child maltreatment
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Number of emergency room visits for injuries
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
EHS-HBO impact study 28 months after assignment 941 mothers Adjusted mean = 0.30 Adjusted mean = 0.30 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05