HS sites in the national evaluation followed written protocols and guidelines that described key program elements and the role of the HS specialist. Another program manual, Strategies for Change: Child Development in Primary Care for Young Children, guided pediatric clinicians in the HS approach. This manual instructed clinicians on how to individualize care, focus on the whole child and whole family, and build a relationship with families; included information on child safety in the home, breastfeeding, smoking, and maternal depression; and included strategies for creating teachable moments. A third set of HS program manuals and other written materials helped to guide site operations and finances, including recommendations for orienting HS specialists to the practice, and example press releases and fact sheets directed toward families. Sites also received a training manual.
Implementing Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)
This report focuses on Healthy Steps as implemented in the 1996 evaluation. HHS has determined that home visiting is not the primary service delivery strategy and the model does not meet current requirements for MIECHV program implementation.
Implementation last updated: 2015
The information in this profile reflects feedback, if provided, from this model’s developer as of the above date. The description of the implementation of the model(s) here may differ from how the model(s) was implemented in the research reviewed to determine this model’s evidence of effectiveness. Inclusion in the implementation report does not mean the practices described meet the HHS criteria for evidence of effectiveness. Similarly, models described here may not all have impact studies, and those with impact studies may vary in their effectiveness. Please see the Effectiveness button on the left for more information about research on the effectiveness of the models discussed here.
Materials and forms to support implementation
Service delivery forms
HS specialists logged detailed information on their contact with families, including the services delivered and topics discussed.
Parents received several written materials to inform them about their child’s development and involve them in their child’s care. These materials included, but were not limited to:
- Child Health and Development Record. This was provided to parents at the beginning of the program and used to record the child’s growth and development, immunizations, and illnesses. It also contained information on developmental milestones and safety.
- Linkletters. This was a newsletter with information on well-child appointments, mailed to parents before their well-child visit.
- Parent prompt sheets. These contained questions parents could ask their clinicians.
Assessment tools
HS specialists periodically assessed each child’s development, either at the home visit or at an office visit, using several standardized tools. Specialists used portions of the Brazelton Neonatal Assessment instrument at the earliest visit, the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory as language began to emerge, and the Denver Developmental Screening Test on a periodic basis.
Curriculum
Sites in the HS (national evaluation) followed protocols and other guidance in the training and operations materials. These materials guided specialists and other clinicians on relaying child development, safety, and other recommendations to parents.
Available languages
All written materials for parents were available in both English and Spanish.
Fidelity measurement
To ensure sites in the national evaluation followed the written protocols and guidelines consistently, the NPO, along with representatives from the implementation team and The Commonwealth Fund, visited sites twice: between 6 and 9 months after operations began, and approximately 18 months after startup. In addition to site visits, NPO staff obtained information on fidelity through formal and informal telephone calls with sites, and through documentation of technical assistance.
Fidelity standards
All sites were required to adhere to the protocols developed for the national evaluation.
Implementation notes
The information contained on this page was last updated in August 2015.