Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)

Last updated: May 2019

Effects Shown in Research & Outcome Measure Details

Positive Parenting Practices

Outcomes Rated High

Adapted Video Interaction to Promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS - VIPP)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type

Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver non-directiveness

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.81

Statistically significant, p < 0.05

Primary

Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver sensitive responding

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary

Outcomes Rated Moderate

Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes

Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitive discipline

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Adjusted mean = 60.71 Adjusted mean = 57.37 MD = 3.34 = 0.27

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

Secondary

footnote1452

Submitted by user on Thu, 05/09/2019 - 19:33
The p-value is based on a MANOVA that controls for child sex and age and dichotomous variables for child temperament, daily hassles, marital discord, maternal well-being, and the educational attainment of those delivering VIPP-SD.

Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitivity

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Adjusted mean = 65.01 Adjusted mean = 59.24 MD = 5.77 = 0.56

Statistically significant, p = 0.00

Secondary

footnote1452

Submitted by user on Thu, 05/09/2019 - 19:33
The p-value is based on a MANOVA that controls for child sex and age and dichotomous variables for child temperament, daily hassles, marital discord, maternal well-being, and the educational attainment of those delivering VIPP-SD.

Maternal negative discipline

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = -0.07 Unadjusted mean = 0.07 MD = -0.14 = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.65

Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Maternal positive discipline

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = 0.35 Unadjusted mean = -0.36 MD = 0.71 = 0.34

Statistically significant, p = 0.01

Primary

Maternal sensitivity

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = 0.00 Unadjusted mean = 0.00 MD = 0.00 = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Primary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitive discipline

The maternal attitudes questionnaire was adapted from scales developed by Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn (2003). It is designed to gauge maternal opinion of sensitive discipline practices. The maternal attitudes toward sensitive discipline subscale involved 10 of the items in the questionnaire. Mother report

Authors reported that this measure is internally consistent, with a Cronbach's alpha of .58

Secondary

Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitivity

The maternal attitudes questionnaire was adapted from scales developed by Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn (2003). It is designed to gauge maternal opinion of sensitive discipline practices. The maternal attitudes toward sensitivity subscale involved 9 of the items in the questionnaire. Mother report

Authors reported that this measure is internally consistent, with a Cronbach's alpha of .54

Secondary

Maternal negative discipline

The maternal positive discipline measure rates negative discipline actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. Interactions involving prohibition, physical obstruction, and giving in were considered negative. Trained observation

Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability was 0.85.

Primary

Maternal positive discipline

The maternal positive discipline measure rates positive discipline actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. Interactions involving distraction, induction, and understanding were considered positive. Trained observation

Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability was 0.85.

Primary

Maternal sensitivity

The maternal sensitivity measure was adapted by the authors from scales developed by Egeland et al. (1990). It is designed to rate sensitive actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. Trained observation

Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability ranges from 0.71 to 0.80.

Primary
Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting adapted to Autism (VIPP-AUTI)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type

Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Non-intrusiveness

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

76 dyads Adjusted mean = 4.06 Adjusted mean = 3.94 MD = 0.12 = 0.47

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

Secondary

Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Sensitivity

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

76 dyads Adjusted mean = 6.34 Adjusted mean = 6.36 MD = -0.02 = 0.13

Not statistically significant, p = 0.56

Secondary

Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Structuring

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

76 dyads Adjusted mean = 3.74 Adjusted mean = 3.82 MD = -0.08 = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.59

Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
View Revisions