Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)

Last updated: May 2019

Effects Shown in Research & Outcome Measure Details

Child Development and School Readiness

Outcomes Rated High

Adapted Video Interaction to Promote Positive Parenting (iBASIS - VIPP)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type

Attention disengagement, measured by gap-overlap task

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.48

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Autism Observation Scale for Infants (AOSI) total score

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.50

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI) expressive

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

52 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.21

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Secondary

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI) receptiveness

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

51 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.17

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Secondary

Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Dyadic mutuality

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.05

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Infant affect

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.19

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Infant attentiveness

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.29

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) expressive score

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.24

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) receptive score

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

54 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.42

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Primary

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II) communication

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

52 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = -0.36

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Secondary

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II) socialization

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

5 months

iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester

49 dyads Not reported Not reported Not reported = 0.42

Not statistically significant, p > 0.05

Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary

Outcomes Rated Moderate

Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Aggressive

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = 4.78 Unadjusted mean = 4.90 MD = -0.12 = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p = 0.77

Secondary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Oppositional

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = 14.02 Unadjusted mean = 14.68 MD = -0.66 = -0.12

Not statistically significant, p = 0.37

Secondary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Overactive

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

1 year

VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands

242 dyads Unadjusted mean = 3.58 Unadjusted mean = 4.05 MD = -0.47 = -0.25

Not statistically significant, p = 0.06

Secondary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Aggressive

The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1-1.5) is a checklist of 100 different behaviors, designed to help identify externalizing problems in infants. The aggressive scale involved 9 of the 100 behaviors. Mother report

Authors reported that this measure is validated and was internally consistent in this study. Chronbach's alpha = 0.75.

Secondary

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Oppositional

The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1-1.5) is a checklist of 100 different behaviors, designed to help identify externalizing problems in infants. The oppositional scale involved 17 of the 100 behaviors. Mother report

Authors reported that this measure is validated and was internally consistent in this study. Chronbach's alpha = 0.89.

Secondary

Dutch Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) Externalizing Problems scale: Overactive

The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 (CBCL/1-1.5) is a checklist of 100 different behaviors, designed to help identify externalizing problems in infants. The overactive scale involved 5 of the 100 behaviors. Mother report

Authors reported that this measure is validated and was internally consistent in this study. Chronbach's alpha = 0.66.

Secondary
Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting adapted to Autism (VIPP-AUTI)
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type

Early Social and Communication Scales (ESCS): Initiating Joint Attention (3 month follow-up)

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

3-month

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

72 dyads Adjusted mean = 33.42 Adjusted mean = 34.41 MD = -0.99 = -0.15

Not statistically significant, p = 0.51

Secondary

Early Social and Communication Scales (ESCS): Initiating Joint Attention (post-test)

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

72 dyads Adjusted mean = 33.79 Adjusted mean = 36.09 MD = -2.30 = -0.35

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

Secondary

Early Social and Communication Scales (ESCS): Responding to Joint Attention (3 month follow-up)

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

3-month

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

72 dyads Adjusted mean = 51.68 Adjusted mean = 52.94 MD = -1.26 = -0.07

Not statistically significant, p = 0.77

Secondary

Early Social and Communication Scales (ESCS): Responding to Joint Attention (post-test)

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

72 dyads Adjusted mean = 48.63 Adjusted mean = 54.06 MD = -5.43 = -0.35

Not statistically significant, p = 0.15

Secondary

Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Child Involvement

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

76 dyads Adjusted mean = 5.02 Adjusted mean = 4.99 MD = 0.03 = 0.06

Not statistically significant, p = 0.78

Secondary

Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Child Responsiveness

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect

Immediate post-test

VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht

76 dyads Adjusted mean = 5.25 Adjusted mean = 5.19 MD = 0.06 = 0.05

Not statistically significant, p = 0.83

Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
View Revisions