Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Last updated: May 2013
Effects Shown in Research & Outcome Measure Details
Positive Parenting Practices
Outcomes Rated High
Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Show Study Effects Details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up Timing | Sample | Sample Size | Program Group | Comparison Group | Group Difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Outcome Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent-Home Survey | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
16 weeks | Full sample | 51 mothers | Mean = 70.58 | Mean = 61.64 | Mean difference = 8.94 | Study reported = 0.87 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 |
Secondary |
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
| Outcome Measure | Outcome Measure Description | Collection method | Properties | Outcome Type | Operations links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parent-Home Survey |
A researcher-developed instrument that assessed parents’ use of home-based supports for children like oral language-based activities, print-based activities, literacy exposure, and parent book reading. The responses were used to generate an index of parent involvement. | Parent/caregiver report | Cronbach’s α = 0.71 |
Secondary |
Outcomes Rated Moderate
Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Show Study Effects Details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up Timing | Sample | Sample Size | Program Group | Comparison Group | Group Difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Outcome Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of days attended (nonparametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
1-year follow-up | City in Arkansas (site A), Cohort I | 86 families | Median % = 97.00 | Median % = 97.00 | Not reported | Study reported = 0.17 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.44 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (nonparametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
1-year follow-up | City in New York (site B), Cohort II | 91 families | Median % = 93.50 | Median % = 93.00 | Not reported | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.91 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (nonparametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in Arkansas (site A), Cohort I | 78 families | Median % = 96.00 | Median % = 94.00 | Not reported | Study reported = 0.39 | Statistically significant, p = 0.054 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (nonparametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in New York (site B), Cohort I | 56 families | Median % = 92.00 | Median % = 92.00 | Not reported | Study reported = 0.10 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.71 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (nonparametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in New York (site B), Cohort II | 97 families | Median % = 88.00 | Median % = 90.00 | Not reported | Study reported = 0.08 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.68 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (parametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
1-year follow-up | City in Arkansas (site A), Cohort I | 86 families | Not available | Not available | Not reported | Study reported = 0.23 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.33 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (parametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
1-year follow-up | City in New York (site B), Cohort II | 91 families | Not available | Not available | Not reported | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.87 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (parametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in Arkansas (site A), Cohort I | 78 families | Adjusted mean % = 94.58 | Adjusted mean % = 93.72 | Mean difference = 0.86 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.44 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (parametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in New York (site B)Cohort I | 56 families | Not available | Not available | Not reported | Study reported = 0.15 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.62 |
Primary |
| Percentage of days attended (parametric test) | FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect |
End of program | City in New York (site B), Cohort II | 97 families | Not available | Not available | Not reported | Study reported = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.75 |
Primary |
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
| Outcome Measure | Outcome Measure Description | Collection method | Properties | Outcome Type | Operations links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of days attended |
Percentage of total school days the child attended | Review of school records | Not applicable |
Primary |