Video-Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD)
Last updated: 2019
Effects shown in research & outcome measure details
Positive parenting practices
Findings rated high
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver non-directiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months |
iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester |
54 dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | = 0.81 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver sensitive responding |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months |
iBASIS-VIPP vs. usual care, London and Manchester |
54 dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties | Operations links |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver non-directiveness |
The Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) is a collection of scales used to evaluate qualitative aspects of caregiver-child interaction observed in videotaped play. |
Trained observation |
Authors report this measure is validated and demonstrates high inter-rater agreement during the study. |
|
Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) Caregiver sensitive responding |
The Manchester Assessment of Caregiver-Infant Interaction (MACI) is a collection of scales used to evaluate qualitative aspects of caregiver-child interaction observed in videotaped play. |
Trained observation |
Authors report this measure is validated and demonstrates high inter-rater agreement during the study. |
Findings rated moderate
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitive discipline |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands |
242 dyads | Adjusted mean = 60.71 | Adjusted mean = 57.37 | MD = 3.34 | = 0.27 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
The p-value is based on a MANOVA that controls for child sex and age and dichotomous variables for child temperament, daily hassles, marital discord, maternal well-being, and the educational attainment of those delivering VIPP-SD.
|
Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitivity |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands |
242 dyads | Adjusted mean = 65.01 | Adjusted mean = 59.24 | MD = 5.77 | = 0.56 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 |
footnote1452The p-value is based on a MANOVA that controls for child sex and age and dichotomous variables for child temperament, daily hassles, marital discord, maternal well-being, and the educational attainment of those delivering VIPP-SD.
|
Maternal negative discipline |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands |
242 dyads | Unadjusted mean = -0.07 | Unadjusted mean = 0.07 | MD = -0.14 | = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.65 |
footnote162Negative value is favorable to the intervention. |
Maternal positive discipline |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands |
242 dyads | Unadjusted mean = 0.35 | Unadjusted mean = -0.36 | MD = 0.71 | = 0.34 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 |
|
Maternal sensitivity |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1 year |
VIPP-SD vs. comparison, western Netherlands |
242 dyads | Unadjusted mean = 0.00 | Unadjusted mean = 0.00 | MD = 0.00 | = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 |
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties | Operations links |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitive discipline |
The maternal attitudes questionnaire was adapted from scales developed by Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn (2003). It is designed to gauge maternal opinion of sensitive discipline practices. The maternal attitudes toward sensitive discipline subscale involved 10 of the items in the questionnaire. | Mother report | Authors reported that this measure is internally consistent, with a Cronbach's alpha of .58 |
|
Maternal attitudes questionnaire: sensitivity |
The maternal attitudes questionnaire was adapted from scales developed by Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn (2003). It is designed to gauge maternal opinion of sensitive discipline practices. The maternal attitudes toward sensitivity subscale involved 9 of the items in the questionnaire. | Mother report | Authors reported that this measure is internally consistent, with a Cronbach's alpha of .54 |
|
Maternal negative discipline |
The maternal positive discipline measure rates negative discipline actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. Interactions involving prohibition, physical obstruction, and giving in were considered negative. | Trained observation | Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability was 0.85. |
|
Maternal positive discipline |
The maternal positive discipline measure rates positive discipline actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. Interactions involving distraction, induction, and understanding were considered positive. | Trained observation | Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability was 0.85. |
|
Maternal sensitivity |
The maternal sensitivity measure was adapted by the authors from scales developed by Egeland et al. (1990). It is designed to rate sensitive actions by mothers in mother-child dyadic interaction. | Trained observation | Authors reported that this measure was internally consistent and that subscale scores were standardized prior to being added. Inter-rater reliability ranges from 0.71 to 0.80. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Non-intrusiveness |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-test |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht |
76 dyads | Adjusted mean = 4.06 | Adjusted mean = 3.94 | MD = 0.12 | = 0.47 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Sensitivity |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-test |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht |
76 dyads | Adjusted mean = 6.34 | Adjusted mean = 6.36 | MD = -0.02 | = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 |
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Structuring |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Immediate post-test |
VIPP-AUTI vs. usual care, Utrecht |
76 dyads | Adjusted mean = 3.74 | Adjusted mean = 3.82 | MD = -0.08 | = 0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 |
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties | Operations links |
---|---|---|---|---|
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Non-intrusiveness |
The Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Non-intrusiveness scale measures parent-child interactions for absence of interfering, overprotectiveness, and overwhelming behaviors. |
Observer-rated |
Scale from 1 to 5. Interrater reliability for the non-intrusiveness scale was 0.77. |
|
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Sensitivity |
The Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Sensitivity scale measures parent-child interactions for parent's responsiveness to child's emotional signals and adjusting communication style for child's emotions. |
Observer-rated |
Scale from 1 to 9. Interrater reliability for the sensitivity scale was 0.77. |
|
Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Structuring |
The Parental Emotional Availability Scales (EAS): Structuring scale measures parent-child interactions for parent's ability to support child's learning and exploration and respect autonomy. |
Observer-rated |
Scale from 1 to 5. Interrater reliability for the structuring scale was 0.78. |