Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024
Effects shown in research
Child development and school readiness
Findings rated high
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Binge drinking |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.21 | Adjusted proportion = 0.24 | Mean difference = -0.03 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.67 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Binge drinking | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 28.00 | Adjusted mean % = 32.00 | Difference = -0.03 | Study reported = -0.10 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Binge drinking | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 36.00 | Adjusted mean % = 32.00 | Difference = 0.04 | Study reported = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever been pregnant |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
116 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.41 | Adjusted proportion = 0.42 | Mean difference = -0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.93 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Ever been pregnant/made a girl pregnant | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 32.40 | Adjusted mean % = 30.90 | Difference = 1.50 | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever been pregnant/made a girl pregnant | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | % (adjusted) = 32.40 | Adjusted mean % = 31.60 | Difference = 0.80 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever fathered a child/given birth | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 21.20 | Adjusted mean % = 20.70 | Difference = 0.50 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever fathered a child/given birth | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 18.10 | Adjusted mean % = 20.70 | Difference = -2.60 | Study reported = -0.10 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever given birth |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
116 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.27 | Adjusted proportion = 0.29 | Mean difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.86 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Frequency of birth control use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | Adjusted mean = 4.70 | Adjusted mean = 4.60 | Mean difference = 0.10 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Frequency of birth control use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | Adjusted mean = 4.90 | Adjusted mean = 4.60 | Mean difference = 0.30 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Frequency of condom use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | Adjusted mean = 3.90 | Adjusted mean = 3.30 | Mean difference = 0.60 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Frequency of condom use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | Adjusted mean = 3.70 | Adjusted mean = 3.30 | Mean difference = 0.40 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Graduated from high school |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.81 | Adjusted proportion = 0.73 | Mean difference = 0.09 | HomVEE calculated = 0.30 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.29 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Graduated from high school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 81.60 | Adjusted mean % = 74.50 | Difference = 7.10 | Study reported = 0.25 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Graduated from high school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 70.60 | Adjusted mean % = 74.50 | Difference = -3.90 | Study reported = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Illicit drug use |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
117 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.48 | Adjusted proportion = 0.52 | Mean difference = -0.04 | HomVEE calculated = -0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.65 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Illicit drug use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | %(adjusted) = 53.00 | Adjusted mean % = 52.00 | Difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Illicit drug use | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | %(adjusted) = 49.00 | Adjusted mean % = 52.00 | Difference = -0.03 | Study reported = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Number of sex partners, past year |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow up |
Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira); Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
115 children | Adjusted mean = 1.40 | Adjusted mean = 1.40 | Mean difference = 0.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Number of sex partners, past year | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 219 children | Adjusted mean = 1.68 | Adjusted mean = 1.55 | Mean difference = 0.13 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Number of sex partners, past year | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
19-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 231 children | Adjusted mean = 1.73 | Adjusted mean = 1.55 | Mean difference = 0.18 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of early onset of problem behaviors | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 228 adolescents | Not available | Not available | OR = 0.28 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. The discussion of outcomes in the text of this study implies that the direction of the effect is in the opposite direction than what is reported in the study and replicated here.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Composite externalizing disorders (ED) continuous total scores: Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (12-year follow-up) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
Nurse home-visited vs. comparison, Memphis sample |
559 children | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Statistical significance is based on information the authors provided in the text. |
Composite externalizing disorders (ED) continuous total scores: Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (2-year follow-up) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
Nurse home-visited vs. comparison, Memphis sample |
587 children | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
Statistical significance and favorability are based on information the authors provided in the text. |
Composite externalizing disorders (ED) continuous total scores: Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (6-year follow-up) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
Nurse home-visited vs. comparison, Memphis sample |
575 children | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Statistical significance is based on information the authors provided in the text. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Math Grades: Parent Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 374 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.14 | Unadjusted mean = 3.21 | Mean difference = -0.07 | Study reported = -0.11 | p-value = 0.32 |
Reading Grades: Parent Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 375 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.14 | Unadjusted mean = 3.18 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = -0.05 | p-value = 0.62 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPA (reading and math) (grades 1-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 2.46 | Mean = 2.27 | Mean difference = 0.20 | HomVEE calculated = 3.32 | Statistically significant, p < .05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
GPA (reading and math) (grades 1–6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | Mean = 2.48 | Mean = 2.39 | Mean difference = 0.09 | HomVEE calculated = 2.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
GPA (reading and math) (grades 4-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 2.27 | Mean = 2.08 | Mean difference = 0.19 | HomVEE calculated = 2.83 | Statistically significant, p < .05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
GPA (reading and math) (grades 4–6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | Mean = 2.28 | Mean = 2.20 | Mean difference = 0.08 | HomVEE calculated = 1.70 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
PIAT scores (reading and math) at 12 years | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 568 children | Mean = 89.24 | Mean = 87.96 | Mean difference = 1.27 | HomVEE calculated = 2.25 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
PIAT scores (reading and math) at 12 years | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 88.78 | Mean = 85.70 | Mean difference = 3.07 | HomVEE calculated = 3.91 | Statistically significant, p < .05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Conduct grades (grades 1-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 2.93 | Mean = 2.86 | Mean difference = 0.07 | HomVEE calculated = 1.61 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Conduct grades (grades 1–-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | Mean = 2.95 | Mean = 2.89 | Mean difference = 0.06 | HomVEE calculated = 1.79 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Conduct grades (grades 4-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 2.91 | Mean = 2.86 | Mean difference = 0.05 | HomVEE calculated = 0.93 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Conduct grades (grades 4–6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | Mean = 2.95 | Mean = 2.88 | Mean difference = 0.07 | HomVEE calculated = 1.87 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Ever placed in special education (grades 1-6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | % = 15.00 | % = 15.00 | OR = 0.97 | HomVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Percentages adjusted for covariates in the model (household poverty and maternal childrearing attitudes).
|
Ever placed in special education (grades 1–6) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | % (adjusted) = 14.80 | Adjusted mean % = 9.80 | OR = 1.61 | HomVEE calculated = 0.28 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever retained | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | % (adjusted) = 24.90 | Adjusted mean % = 20.80 | OR = 1.26 | HomVEE calculated = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Ever retained | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | % = 23.00 | % = 27.00 | OR = 0.77 | HomVEE calculated = -0.16 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Percentages adjusted for covariates in the model (household poverty and maternal childrearing attitudes).
|
Externalizing disorders | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers, 578 children, and 548 teachers | % (adjusted) = 19.70 | Adjusted mean % = 17.80 | OR = 1.13 | HomVEE calculated = 0.08 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Externalizing disorders | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | % (adjusted) = 24.00 | Adjusted mean % = 22.00 | OR = 1.12 | HomVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Group achievement test scores (reading and math) (grades 1-6), percentile1 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 40.52 | Mean = 34.85 | Mean difference = 5.67 | HomVEE calculated = 3.39 | Statistically significant, p < .05 | |
Group achievement test scores (reading and math) (grades 1–6), percentile | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | Mean = 42.34 | Mean = 39.79 | Mean difference = 2.55 | HomVEE calculated = 2.12 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Group achievement test scores (reading and math) (grades 4-6), percentile1 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 36.86 | Mean = 33.67 | Mean difference = 3.19 | HomVEE calculated = 1.87 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Group achievement test scores (reading and math) (grades 4–6), percentile | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 635 children | Mean = 39.37 | Mean = 38.27 | Mean difference = 1.09 | HomVEE calculated = 0.89 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | Outcome examined with repeated measures.
|
Incidence of days of substance use in the past 30 days | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | = 0.03 | = 0.18 | IR = 0.15 | Not available | Statistically significant, p < .05 | |
Internalizing disorders | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | %(adjusted) = 32.00 | Adjusted mean % = 36.00 | OR = 0.81 | HomVEE calculated = -0.13 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Internalizing disorders | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | %(adjusted) = 22.10 | Adjusted mean % = 30.90 | OR = 0.63 | HomVEE calculated = -0.28 | Statistically significant, p < .05 | |
Leiter-R Sustained Attention test scaled score | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | Mean = 8.68 | Mean = 8.75 | Mean difference = -0.07 | HomVEE calculated = -0.42 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Leiter-R Sustained Attention test scaled score | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | Mean = 8.63 | Mean = 8.72 | Mean difference = -0.09 | HomVEE calculated = -0.39 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Number of substances used in the past 30 days | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | = 0.02 | = 0.08 | IR = 0.06 | Not available | Statistically significant, p < .05 | |
Total problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 326 mothers | % (adjusted = 30.00 | Adjusted mean % = 27.00 | OR = 1.17 | HomVEE calculated = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Total problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 594 mothers, 578 children, and 548 teachers | % (adjusted) = 23.70 | Adjusted mean % = 19.80 | OR = 1.26 | HomVEE calculated = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
Used cigarettes, alcohol, or marijuana in the past 30 days | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 578 children | %(adjusted) = 1.70 | Adjusted mean % = 5.10 | OR = 0.31 | HomVEE calculated = -0.69 | Statistically significant, p < .05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCL (total score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postnatal | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 1082 children | Adjusted mean = 46.00 | Adjusted mean = 49.20 | Mean difference = -3.20 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
BSID (total score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years postnatal | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 1082 children | Adjusted mean = 94.50 | Adjusted mean = 94.30 | Mean difference = 0.20 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Externalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
574 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.21 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.18 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomVEE calculated = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.50 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Externalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
611 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.08 | Adjusted proportion = 0.07 | Odds ratio = 1.13 | HomVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.72 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
577 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.25 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.32 | Mean difference = -0.07 | HomVEE calculated = -0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.09 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
625 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.17 | Adjusted proportion = 0.18 | Odds ratio = 0.92 | HomVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.73 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Internalizing Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
618 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.15 | Mean difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.62 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
575 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.25 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.21 | Mean difference = 0.04 | HomVEE calculated = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.31 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
611 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.07 | Adjusted proportion = 0.04 | Odds ratio = 1.60 | HomVEE calculated = 0.28 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.22 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), Total Behavior Problems (borderline or clinical threshold) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
616 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.03 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 | Mean difference = -0.03 | HomVEE calculated = -0.48 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.11 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) Externalizing Behavior Problems, borderline or clinical threshold |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
620 children | Unadjusted proportion = 0.18 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.20 | Mean difference = -0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Any positive STI laboratory test result |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys) |
286 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.15 | Adjusted proportion = 0.15 | Odds ratio = 0.95 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.89 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Any positive STI laboratory test result |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
319 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.26 | Adjusted proportion = 0.23 | Odds ratio = 1.16 | HomVEE calculated = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.60 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Current drug use in the past month or positive lab test result |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
613 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.51 | Adjusted proportion = 0.48 | Odds ratio = 1.11 | HomVEE calculated = 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.55 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Facial Emotion Recognition Task, Emotion recognition |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
329 children | Adjusted mean = 54.19 | Adjusted mean = 52.32 | Mean difference = 1.87 | Study reported = 0.22 | Statistically significant, p= 0.04 |
|
Facial Emotion Recognition Task, Emotion recognition |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
617 children | Adjusted mean = 53.75 | Adjusted mean = 52.55 | Mean difference = 1.20 | Study reported = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.08 |
|
Graduated from high school |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
333 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.71 | Adjusted proportion = 0.70 | Odds ratio = 1.06 | HomVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.83 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Graduated from high school |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
619 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.76 | Adjusted proportion = 0.72 | Odds ratio = 1.21 | HomVEE calculated = 0.12 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.35 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Graduated with honors |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
619 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.09 | Adjusted proportion = 0.04 | Odds ratio = 2.12 | HomVEE calculated = 0.46 | Statistically significant, p= 0.03 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Graduated with honors |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
333 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.08 | Adjusted proportion = 0.03 | Odds ratio = 3.34 | HomVEE calculated = 0.73 | Statistically significant, p= 0.02 |
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
HIV risk |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
604 children | Adjusted mean = -13.77 | Adjusted mean = -13.50 | Mean difference = -0.27 | Study reported = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.38 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
621 children | Adjusted mean = 82.34 | Adjusted mean = 81.60 | Mean difference = 0.74 | Study reported = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.55 |
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
331 children | Adjusted mean = 82.32 | Adjusted mean = 79.02 | Mean difference = 3.30 | Study reported = 0.24 | Statistically significant, p= 0.05 |
|
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability |
323 children | Unadjusted mean = 81.13 | Unadjusted mean = 79.49 | Mean difference = 1.64 | HomVEE calculated = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.28 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III), Receptive language |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014, full sample |
612 children | Unadjusted mean = 83.65 | Unadjusted mean = 82.49 | Mean difference = 1.16 | HomVEE calculated = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.31 |
Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations. |
Time to first live birth |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
324 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.14 | Adjusted proportion = 0.17 | Incidence rate = -0.03 | Study reported = 0.80 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.44 |
|
Time to first live birth |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys) |
305 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.08 | Adjusted proportion = 0.06 | Incidence rate = 0.01 | Study reported = 1.20 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.62 |
|
Time to first pregnancy |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (girls) |
324 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.23 | Adjusted proportion = 0.26 | Incidence rate = -0.04 | Study reported = 0.85 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.46 |
|
Time to first pregnancy |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
18 years |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT, Memphis TN, 1990-2014; Subgroup: Child gender (boys) |
305 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.15 | Adjusted proportion = 0.17 | Incidence rate = -0.02 | Study reported = 0.86 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.57 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total competence score |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
932 children | Adjusted mean = 27.50 | Adjusted mean = 27.60 | Difference = -0.10 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Received any early intervention services (%) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
910 mothers | Adjusted proportion = 0.04 | Adjusted proportion = 0.04 | Difference = 0.00 | Study reported = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Use of nonparental child care |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-month follow-up |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States,full sample |
905 children | Adjusted proportion = 0.51 | Adjusted proportion = 0.56 | Difference = -0.05 | Study reported = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported; precise p-values are not available. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (fixed effect random slope analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
929 children | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Study reported = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.11 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (restricted maximum likelihood analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
929 children | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Study reported = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.16 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (split-sample analysis) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 months old |
NFP vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample |
929 children | Not reported | Not reported | Difference = 0.02 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.69 |
Negative effect is favorable to the intervention. |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSID MDI | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison | 204 children | Adjusted mean = 111.23 | Adjusted mean = 109.94 | Mean difference = 1.29 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
BSID Mental Development Index (MDI) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison | 199 children | Adjusted mean = 105.44 | Adjusted mean = 109.94 | Mean difference = -4.50 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Cattell | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison | 186 children | Adjusted mean = 105.73 | Adjusted mean = 106.49 | Mean difference = -0.76 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Cattell | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison | 193 children | Adjusted mean = 109.34 | Adjusted mean = 106.49 | Mean difference = 2.85 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Crying (mother-reported number of episodes last 2 weeks) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 164 children | Adjusted mean = 4.05 | Adjusted mean = 3.93 | Mean difference = 0.12 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Crying (mother-reported number of episodes last 2 weeks) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 3.44 | Adjusted mean = 3.93 | Mean difference = -0.49 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Mother- reported positive mood | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 199 children | Adjusted mean = 2.34 | Adjusted mean = 2.29 | Mean difference = 0.05 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported |
Mother-reported positive mood | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 209 children | Adjusted mean = 2.40 | Adjusted mean = 2.29 | Mean difference = 0.11 | Not available | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of child behavioral/parental coping problems in physician record (25 to 50 months) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
50 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 209 mothers | Adjusted mean = 0.43 | Adjusted mean = 0.71 | Mean difference = -0.28 | Not available | Statistical significance not reported | |
Number of child behavioral/parental coping problems in physician record (25 to 50 months) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
50 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 221 mothers | Adjusted mean = 0.39 | Adjusted mean = 0.71 | Mean difference = -0.32 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ .01 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Stanford Binet | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
36 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 226 children | Adjusted mean = 104.20 | Adjusted mean = 101.95 | Mean difference = 2.25 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Stanford Binet | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
36 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 236 children | Adjusted mean = 103.57 | Adjusted mean = 101.95 | Mean difference = 1.62 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Stanford Binet | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
48 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 226 children | Adjusted mean = 111.25 | Adjusted mean = 108.93 | Mean difference = 2.32 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Stanford Binet | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
48 months | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 236 children | Adjusted mean = 111.52 | Adjusted mean = 108.93 | Mean difference = 2.59 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alcohol and drug impairment (mother report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15 year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.28 | Adjusted mean = 0.18 | Mean difference = -0.10 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.68 |
|
Alcohol and drug impairment (mother report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 277 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.20 | Adjusted mean = 0.18 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.96 |
|
Alcohol impairment (self-report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.47 | Adjusted mean = 0.52 | Mean difference = -0.05 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.35 |
|
Alcohol impairment (self-report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.50 | Adjusted mean = 0.52 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.95 |
|
Ever had sexual intercourse | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | % (adjusted) = 35.00 | Adjusted mean % = 35.00 | Mean difference = 0.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Ever pregnant or made someone pregnant | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | % (adjusted) = 2.00 | Adjusted mean % = 3.00 | Mean difference = -1.00 | HomVEE calculated = -0.25 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Ever pregnant or made someone pregnant | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | % (adjusted) = 4.00 | Adjusted mean % = 3.00 | Mean difference = 1.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.18 | Not statistically significant, p = 1.00 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Incidence of sex partners (number) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 1.16 | Adjusted mean = 1.56 | Mean difference = -0.40 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence of sex partners (number) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 1.10 | Adjusted mean = 1.56 | Mean difference = -0.46 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.48 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–cigarettes smoked per day | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.91 | Adjusted mean = 1.30 | Mean difference = -0.39 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.49 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–cigarettes smoked per day | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 1.28 | Adjusted mean = 1.30 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.76 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–days drank alcohol | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 1.87 | Adjusted mean = 1.57 | Mean difference = -0.30 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.96 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–days drank alcohol | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 1.81 | Adjusted mean = 1.57 | Mean difference = 0.24 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–days used drugs | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 2.04 | Adjusted mean = 2.28 | Mean difference = -0.24 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–days used drugs | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 3.55 | Adjusted mean = 2.28 | Mean difference = 1.27 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.49 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–times ran away (self report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.34 | Adjusted mean = 0.29 | Mean difference = 0.05 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Incidence–times ran away (self-report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 0.23 | Adjusted mean = 0.29 | Mean difference = -0.06 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.83 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the log-incidence difference.
|
Number of acting out problems (teacher report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 8.97 | Adjusted mean = 9.61 | Mean difference = -0.64 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.41 |
|
Number of acting out problems (teacher report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 9.47 | Adjusted mean = 9.61 | Mean difference = -0.14 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.85 |
|
Number of externalizing problems (self-report and mother report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 13.65 | Adjusted mean = 13.73 | Mean difference = -0.08 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.95 |
|
Number of externalizing problems (self-report and mother report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 13.88 | Adjusted mean = 13.73 | Mean difference = 0.15 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 |
|
Number of internalizing problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 11.19 | Adjusted mean = 10.58 | Mean difference = 0.61 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 |
|
Number of internalizing problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 11.66 | Adjusted mean = 10.58 | Mean difference = 1.08 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.19 |
|
Number of minor antisocial acts (self-report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) | 227 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 2.54 | Adjusted mean = 2.99 | Mean difference = -0.45 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.50 |
|
Number of minor antisocial acts (self-report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
15-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) | 245 adolescents | Adjusted mean = 2.88 | Adjusted mean = 2.99 | Mean difference = -0.11 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.86 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attention dysfunction - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 378 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.02 | Unadjusted mean = 0.05 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = 0.34 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Externalizing - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 396 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Study reported = 0.76 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.42 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Internalizing - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 396 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.01 | Unadjusted mean = 0.03 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Study reported = 0.42 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.28 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Total behavioral problems - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 396 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = 0.45 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCL (externalizing problems) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | % (adjusted) = 17.40 | Adjusted mean % = 20.20 | OR = 0.83 | HomVEE calculated = -0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.43 | |
CBCL (externalizing problems) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | % (adjusted) = 22.00 | Adjusted mean % = 24.00 | OR = 0.87 | HomVEE calculated = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.63 |
|
CBCL (internalizing problems) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | % (adjusted) = 20.00 | Adjusted mean % = 17.00 | OR = 1.30 | HomVEE calculated = 0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.40 |
|
CBCL (internalizing problems) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | % (adjusted) = 12.60 | Adjusted mean % = 14.70 | OR = 0.84 | HomVEE calculated = -0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.50 | |
CBCL (total problems, percentage) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean % = 3.70 | Adjusted mean % = 6.60 | Difference = -2.90 | Study reported = -0.37 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.31 |
|
CBCL (total problems) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | % (adjusted) = 2.00 | Adjusted mean % = 5.00 | OR = 0.32 | HomVEE calculated = -0.37 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
HTC Rating Scale (classroom social skills) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 24.93 | Adjusted mean = 24.53 | Mean difference = 0.40 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.71 |
|
HTC Rating Scale(academic engagement) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 6.16 | Adjusted mean = 6.86 | Mean difference = -0.70 | Study reported = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.72 |
|
HTC Rating Scale(academic engagement) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 4.74 | Adjusted mean = 4.23 | Mean difference = 0.51 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.86 |
|
HTC Rating Scale(classroom social skills) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 24.54 | Adjusted mean = 22.92 | Mean difference = 1.62 | Study reported = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.27 |
|
KABC arithmetic achievement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 88.61 | Adjusted mean = 85.42 | Mean difference = 3.19 | Study reported = 0.25 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
|
KABC arithmetic achievement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 89.75 | Adjusted mean = 88.61 | Mean difference = 1.14 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.30 | |
KABC mental processing composite (arithmetic and reading) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 92.34 | Adjusted mean = 90.24 | Mean difference = 2.10 | Study reported = 0.18 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
|
KABC mental processing composite (arithmetic and reading) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 90.49 | Adjusted mean = 87.64 | Mean difference = 2.85 | Study reported = 0.25 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
|
KABC reading achievement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 92.07 | Adjusted mean = 90.87 | Mean difference = 1.20 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.44 |
|
KABC reading achievement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 93.79 | Adjusted mean = 93.56 | Mean difference = 0.23 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.84 | |
MSSB (dysregulated aggression index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 98.58 | Adjusted mean = 101.10 | Mean difference = -2.52 | Study reported = -0.25 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
|
MSSB (dysregulated aggression index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 99.24 | Adjusted mean = 100.26 | Mean difference = -1.02 | Study reported = -0.10 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 |
|
MSSB (percentage incoherent stories) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 20.90 | Adjusted mean = 29.84 | Mean difference = -8.94 | Study reported = -0.34 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
|
MSSB (percentage incoherent stories) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 21.15 | Adjusted mean = 25.22 | Mean difference = -4.07 | Study reported = -0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
|
MSSB (warmth/ empathy index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 100.30 | Adjusted mean = 98.98 | Mean difference = 1.32 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.27 |
|
MSSB (warmth/empathy index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 100.86 | Adjusted mean = 99.51 | Mean difference = 1.35 | Study reported = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.13 |
|
PPVT-III receptive vocabulary | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 335 children | Adjusted mean = 81.75 | Adjusted mean = 79.08 | Mean difference = 2.67 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
|
PPVT-III receptive vocabulary | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 615 children | Adjusted mean = 84.32 | Adjusted mean = 82.13 | Mean difference = 2.19 | Study reported = 0.17 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
|
Child attended Head Start, preschool, day care, or early intervention, age 24–54 months | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 641 mothers | % (adjusted) = 82.00 | Adjusted mean % = 75.00 | OR = 1.53 | HomVEE calculated = 0.26 | Statistically significant, p = 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPA (reading and math, grades 1 – 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 2.68 | Adjusted mean = 2.44 | Mean difference = 0.24 | Study reported = 0.22 | Statistically significant, p = 0.02 |
|
GPA (reading and math, grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | Adjusted mean = 2.69 | Adjusted mean = 2.59 | Mean difference = 0.10 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.20 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Achievement tests (reading and math, grades 1 – 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 44.89 | Adjusted mean = 35.72 | Mean difference = 9.17 | Study reported = 0.33 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
|
Achievement tests (reading and math, grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 570 children | Adjusted mean = 44.61 | Adjusted mean = 41.63 | Mean difference = 2.98 | Study reported = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.17 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Any academic failures (grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | = 0.07 | = 0.05 | Mean difference = 2.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.20 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.37 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Conduct grades (grades 1 – 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 2.68 | Adjusted mean = 2.65 | Mean difference = 0.03 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.75 |
|
Conduct grades (grades 1–3 ) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | Adjusted mean = 2.71 | Adjusted mean = 2.68 | Mean difference = 0.03 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.67 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Count of conduct failures, (grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | Adjusted mean = 0.06 | Adjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.09 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Count of depressive and anxiety disorders | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | Adjusted mean = 0.12 | Adjusted mean = 0.19 | Mean difference = -0.07 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculation of incidence ratio.
|
Count of disruptive behavior disorders (with impairment) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | Adjusted mean = 0.36 | Adjusted mean = 0.31 | Mean difference = -0.05 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p = 0.42 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculation of incidence ratio.
|
Ever placed in special education (grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | = 0.02 | = 0.02 | Mean difference = 0.00 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Ever retained (grades 1–3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 604 children | = 0.16 | = 0.12 | Mean difference = 4.00 | HomVEE calculated = 0.18 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.25 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Teacher reported peer affiliation (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 558 children | Adjusted mean = 100.35 | Adjusted mean = 99.92 | Mean difference = 0.43 | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.64 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Teacher-reported academically focused behavior (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 558 children | Adjusted mean = 100.10 | Adjusted mean = 100.08 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Study reported = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.98 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Teacher-reported academically focused behavior (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 99.59 | Adjusted mean = 98.70 | Mean difference = 0.89 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.47 |
|
Teacher-reported antisocial behavior (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) | 558 children | Adjusted mean = 99.77 | Adjusted mean = 100.08 | Mean difference = -0.31 | Study reported = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.74 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Teacher-reported antisocial behavior (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9-year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 100.18 | Adjusted mean = 100.17 | Mean difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.99 |
|
Teacher-reported peer affiliation (grade 3) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 year follow-up | Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 333 children | Adjusted mean = 99.56 | Adjusted mean = 99.37 | Mean difference = 0.19 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCL | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 136 children | Adjusted mean = 48.13 | Adjusted mean = 49.25 | Mean difference = -1.12 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID (mental development delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 136 children | = 0.10 | = 0.19 | OR = 0.48 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
BSID (mental development index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 136 children | Adjusted mean = 90.18 | Adjusted mean = 86.20 | Mean difference = 3.98 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
The confidence interval includes 0, but according to the study, the result is statistically significant (α = 0.05).
|
PLS-3 (language delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 children | % (adjusted) = 6.00 | Adjusted mean % = 12.00 | OR = 0.48 | HomVEE calculated = -0.45 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 142 children | = 0.07 | = 0.18 | OR = 0.32 | HomVEE calculated = -0.65 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language development) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 children | Adjusted mean = 101.22 | Adjusted mean = 99.49 | Mean difference = 1.73 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
PLS-3 (language development) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 142 children | Adjusted mean = 101.52 | Adjusted mean = 96.85 | Mean difference = 4.67 | Not available | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
Infant low vitality: anger stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 138 children | = 0.13 | = 0.32 | OR = 0.33 | HomVEE calculated = -0.31 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
Infant low vitality: joy stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 138 children | = 0.24 | = 0.40 | OR = 0.46 | HomVEE calculated = -0.45 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
Infant vulnerability: fear stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 138 children | = 0.12 | = 0.21 | OR = 0.51 | HomVEE calculated = -0.34 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
Irritable temperament | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 138 children | Adjusted mean = 2.88 | Adjusted mean = 2.92 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLS-3 (total language score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 408 children | Adjusted mean = 92.65 | Adjusted mean = 92.01 | Mean difference = 0.64 | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.65 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
PLS-3 (Total language score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 144 children | Adjusted mean = 91.39 | Adjusted mean = 86.73 | Mean difference = 4.66 | Study reported = 0.31 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
|
Behavioral adaptation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 408 children | Adjusted mean = 99.63 | Adjusted mean = 99.71 | Mean difference = -0.08 | Study reported = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.93 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
Behavioral adaptation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 144 children | Adjusted mean = 100.41 | Adjusted mean = 96.66 | Mean difference = 3.75 | Study reported = 0.38 | Statistically significant, p = 0.04 |
|
Child attended Head Start, preschool, center-based day care, or government-supported family care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 424 mothers | = 0.54 | = 0.66 | OR = 0.62 | HomVEE calculated = -0.29 | Statistically significant, p = 0.03 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
Emotional regulation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 408 children | Adjusted mean = 99.54 | Adjusted mean = 99.61 | Mean difference = -0.07 | Study reported = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.95 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
Emotional regulation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 144 children | Adjusted mean = 99.54 | Adjusted mean = 98.42 | Mean difference = 1.12 | Study reported = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 |
|
Executive function composite | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 408 children | Adjusted mean = 100.64 | Adjusted mean = 99.69 | Mean difference = 0.95 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.34 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
Executive function composite | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 144 children | Adjusted mean = 100.16 | Adjusted mean = 95.48 | Mean difference = 4.68 | Study reported = 0.47 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 |
|
Externalizing behavior problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 408 children | Adjusted mean = 12.16 | Adjusted mean = 12.20 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = -0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.96 |
Information on sample sizes for this study was received through communication with the authors. HomVEE previously rated 24-month outcomes for nurse home visitors Moderate due to high attrition. Upon further examination, HomVEE noted that the outcomes had low attrition, and therefore they rate High. |
Externalizing behavior problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Nurse home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 144 children | Adjusted mean = 13.16 | Adjusted mean = 12.95 | Mean difference = 0.21 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPD Total Score - borderline/clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 328 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | OR = 1.78 | HomVEE calculated = 0.37 | p-value = 0.37 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Externalizing - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 320 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.14 | Unadjusted mean = 0.14 | OR = 1.40 | HomVEE calculated = 0.20 | p-value = 0.33 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Internalizing - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 317 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | OR = 0.95 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | p-value = 0.9 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Total - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 317 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | OR = 0.97 | HomVEE calculated = -0.01 | p-value = 0.94 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Current grade placement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 321 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.45 | Unadjusted mean = 4.45 | Mean difference = 0.12 | Study reported = 0.16 | p-value = 0.13 | |
Learning support services: hrs/week | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 309 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.22 | Unadjusted mean = 1.22 | Mean difference = -0.42 | Study reported = -0.09 | p-value = 0.4 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Math Grades: Parent Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 391 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.11 | Unadjusted mean = 3.11 | Mean difference = -0.10 | Study reported = -0.15 | p-value = 0.16 | |
Math Grades: School Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 305 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.51 | Unadjusted mean = 2.51 | Mean difference = -0.17 | Study reported = -0.15 | p-value = 0.15 | |
Reading Grades: Parent Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 391 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.12 | Unadjusted mean = 3.12 | Mean difference = -0.06 | Study reported = -0.07 | p-value = 0.47 | |
Reading Grades: School Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 307 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.32 | Unadjusted mean = 2.32 | Mean difference = -0.17 | Study reported = -0.16 | p-value = 0.14 | |
Special Education school report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 308 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.16 | Unadjusted mean = 0.16 | OR = 1.01 | HomVEE calculated = 0.01 | p-value = 0.98 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Times sent to Principal"s office | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Paraprofessional vs. Control | 326 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.44 | Unadjusted mean = 1.44 | Mean difference = 0.14 | Study reported = 0.15 | p-value = 0.18 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attention dysfunction - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 394 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.03 | Unadjusted mean = 0.05 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Study reported = 0.53 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.22 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Externalizing - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 411 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.09 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = -0.01 | Study reported = 0.87 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.66 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Externalizing - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 394 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.14 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = 0.04 | Study reported = 1.34 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.33 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Internalizing - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 411 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | Unadjusted mean = 0.03 | Mean difference = 0.01 | Study reported = 1.35 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.60 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Internalizing - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 394 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Study reported = 0.96 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.90 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Total behavioral problems - 6 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver) | 411 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Study reported = 1.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.91 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Total behavioral problems - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 394 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.09 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = 0.00 | Study reported = 0.97 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.94 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCL | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 392 children | Adjusted mean = 45.49 | Adjusted mean = 45.26 | Mean difference = 0.23 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
CBCL | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 48.79 | Adjusted mean = 49.25 | Mean difference = -0.46 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID (mental development delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 392 children | % (adjusted) = 14.00 | Adjusted mean % = 13.00 | OR = 1.07 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID (Mental development delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | = 0.19 | = 0.19 | OR = 0.97 | HomVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
BSID (Mental development index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 88.54 | Adjusted mean = 86.20 | Mean difference = 2.33 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID (Mental Developmental Index) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 392 children | Adjusted mean = 89.45 | Adjusted mean = 89.38 | Mean difference = 0.07 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 420 children | % (adjusted) = 11.00 | Adjusted mean % = 12.00 | OR = 0.90 | HomVEE calculated = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 children | % (adjusted) = 6.00 | Adjusted mean % = 12.00 | OR = 0.48 | HomVEE calculated = -0.45 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language delay) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | = 0.13 | = 0.18 | OR = 0.66 | HomVEE calculated = -0.23 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
PLS-3 (language development) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 406 children | Adjusted mean = 101.22 | Adjusted mean = 99.49 | Mean difference = 1.73 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language development) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 420 children | Adjusted mean = 99.89 | Adjusted mean = 99.49 | Mean difference = 0.40 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
PLS-3 (language development) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
21-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 97.83 | Adjusted mean = 96.85 | Mean difference = 0.98 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Infant low vitality: anger stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 158 children | = 0.22 | = 0.32 | OR = 0.63 | HomVEE calculated = -0.31 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
Infant low vitality: joy stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 158 children | = 0.30 | = 0.40 | OR = 0.64 | HomVEE calculated = -0.27 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
Infant vulnerability: fear stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 158 children | = 0.17 | = 0.21 | OR = 0.77 | HomVEE calculated = -0.16 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Authors report results are not statistically significant, although this appears to be inconsistent with the confidence interval.
|
Irritable temperament | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6-month follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 158 children | Adjusted mean = 2.95 | Adjusted mean = 2.92 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Not available | HomVEE = > 0.05 | |
Irritable temperament (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 377 children | Adjusted mean = 2.83 | Adjusted mean = 2.84 | Mean difference = -0.01 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Low vitality: anger stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 377 children | % (adjusted) = 26.00 | Adjusted mean % = 28.00 | OR = 0.89 | HomVEE calculated = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Low vitality: joy stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 377 children | % (adjusted) = 31.00 | Adjusted mean % = 34.00 | OR = 0.88 | HomVEE calculated = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
Vulnerable: fear stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 377 children | % (adjusted) = 18.00 | Adjusted mean % = 25.00 | OR = 0.67 | HomVEE calculated = -0.25 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLS-3 (Total language score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 90.09 | Adjusted mean = 86.73 | Mean difference = 3.36 | Study reported = 0.23 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.13 |
Behavioral adaptation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 99.51 | Adjusted mean = 96.66 | Mean difference = 2.85 | Study reported = 0.28 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.10 |
Emotional regulation in testing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 99.29 | Adjusted mean = 98.42 | Mean difference = 0.87 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 |
Executive function composite | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 98.40 | Adjusted mean = 95.48 | Mean difference = 2.92 | Study reported = 0.29 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.06 |
Externalizing behavior problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
4-year follow-up | Paraprofessional home visitors and comparison (Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 12.91 | Adjusted mean = 12.95 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.98 |
Findings rated moderate
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPD Total Score - borderline/clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 310 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.01 | Unadjusted mean = 0.02 | OR = 0.62 | HomVEE calculated = -0.26 | p-value = 0.59 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Externalizing - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 303 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.07 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | OR = 0.62 | HomVEE calculated = -0.29 | p-value = 0.26 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Internalizing - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 302 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | OR = 0.41 | HomVEE calculated = -0.53 | p-value = 0.1 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
CBCL Total - Dual Rater Clinical | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 302 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.07 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | OR = 0.74 | HomVEE calculated = -0.18 | p-value = 0.47 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Current grade placement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 304 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 4.35 | Unadjusted mean = 4.33 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Study reported = 0.06 | p-value = 0.57 | |
Learning support services: hrs/week | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 294 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.53 | Unadjusted mean = 1.64 | Mean difference = -0.11 | Study reported = -0.02 | p-value = 0.83 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Math Grades: Parent Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 374 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 3.14 | Unadjusted mean = 3.21 | Mean difference = -0.07 | Study reported = -0.11 | p-value = 0.32 | |
Math Grades: School Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 295 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.54 | Unadjusted mean = 2.68 | Mean difference = -0.14 | Study reported = -0.12 | p-value = 0.24 | |
Reading Grades: School Report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 294 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 2.47 | Unadjusted mean = 2.49 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Study reported = -0.03 | p-value = 0.8 | |
Special Education school report | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 294 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 0.12 | Unadjusted mean = 0.16 | OR = 0.76 | HomVEE calculated = -0.17 | p-value = 0.42 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Times sent to Principal's office | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Age 9 follow-up | Denver Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - Nurse vs. Control | 308 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 1.32 | Unadjusted mean = 1.30 | Mean difference = 0.02 | Study reported = 0.02 | p-value = 0.85 | Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any therapeutic services - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.17 | Unadjusted mean = 0.36 | Mean difference = -0.19 | HomVEE calculated = -0.63 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Any therapeutic services - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 127 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.35 | Unadjusted mean = 0.30 | Mean difference = 0.05 | HomVEE calculated = 0.15 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Arithmetic achievement standard score - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 94.27 | Adjusted mean = 92.66 | Mean difference = 1.61 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.44 | |
Arithmetic achievement standard score - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 128 children | Adjusted mean = 96.72 | Adjusted mean = 96.53 | Mean difference = 0.19 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.93 | |
Arithmetic achievement standard score - averaged over 6 and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 128 children | Adjusted mean = 95.49 | Adjusted mean = 94.60 | Mean difference = 0.89 | Study reported = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.63 | |
Behvioral regulation in testing - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 140 children | Adjusted mean = 99.13 | Adjusted mean = 97.16 | Mean difference = 1.97 | Study reported = 0.23 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.18 | |
Dysregulated aggression - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 100.40 | Adjusted mean = 103.26 | Mean difference = -2.86 | Study reported = -0.26 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.12 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Externalizing - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 378 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.07 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Study reported = 0.64 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.25 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Grade retention - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 127 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.13 | Unadjusted mean = 0.09 | Mean difference = 0.05 | HomVEE calculated = 0.29 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.38 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Intellectual functioning - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 96.58 | Adjusted mean = 94.85 | Mean difference = 1.73 | Study reported = 0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.35 | |
Internalizing - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 378 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.04 | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Mean difference = -0.05 | Study reported = 0.44 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Percent incoherent stories - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 58.53 | Adjusted mean = 65.63 | Mean difference = -7.10 | Study reported = -0.23 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.17 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Reading achievement standard score - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 95.00 | Adjusted mean = 93.40 | Mean difference = 1.60 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 | |
Reading achievement standard score - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 128 children | Adjusted mean = 97.20 | Adjusted mean = 94.60 | Mean difference = 2.60 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.22 | |
Reading achievement standard score - averaged over 6 and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 128 children | Adjusted mean = 96.10 | Adjusted mean = 94.00 | Mean difference = 2.10 | Study reported = 0.17 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.27 | |
Receptive language - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 93.31 | Adjusted mean = 90.56 | Mean difference = 2.75 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.16 | |
Receptive language - averaged over 2, 4, and 6 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 141 children | Adjusted mean = 92.96 | Adjusted mean = 89.01 | Mean difference = 3.95 | Study reported = 0.30 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | |
Special education/remedial services - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 127 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.19 | Unadjusted mean = 0.34 | Mean difference = -0.14 | HomVEE calculated = -0.46 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.06 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Sustained attention - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 138 children | Adjusted mean = 9.28 | Adjusted mean = 8.32 | Mean difference = 0.96 | Study reported = 0.33 | Statistically significant, p = 0.05 | |
Sustained attention - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 126 children | Adjusted mean = 10.12 | Adjusted mean = 9.17 | Mean difference = 0.95 | Study reported = 0.33 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 | |
Sustained attention - averaged over 4, 6, and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 126 children | Adjusted mean = 9.83 | Adjusted mean = 8.80 | Mean difference = 1.03 | Study reported = 0.36 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | |
Total behavioral problems - 9 year, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver) | 378 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.07 | Unadjusted mean = 0.10 | Mean difference = -0.02 | Study reported = 0.76 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Visual attention/task switching errors - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 126 children | Adjusted mean = 0.89 | Adjusted mean = 1.16 | Mean difference = -0.27 | Study reported = -0.25 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.16 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Working memory errors - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 3 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Nurse home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 123 children | Adjusted mean = 6.13 | Adjusted mean = 5.47 | Mean difference = 0.66 | Study reported = 0.26 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.15 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCL (Behavior problems score) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 372 children | Adjusted mean = 43.71 | Adjusted mean = 45.26 | Mean difference = -1.56 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID MDI | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 372 children | Adjusted mean = 90.13 | Adjusted mean = 89.38 | Mean difference = 0.75 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
|
BSID, MDI: Mental development delay | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 372 children | Adjusted mean % = 11.00 | Adjusted mean % = 13.00 | OR = 0.83 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Infant low vitality: anger stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 363 children | Adjusted mean % = 19.00 | Adjusted mean % = 28.00 | OR = 0.62 | HomVEE calculated = -0.31 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Infant low vitality: joy stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 363 children | Adjusted mean % = 26.00 | Adjusted mean % = 34.00 | OR = 0.68 | HomVEE calculated = -0.23 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Infant vulnerability: fear stimuli (video coding) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 363 children | % (adjusted) = 16.00 | Adjusted mean % = 25.00 | OR = 0.57 | HomVEE calculated = -0.34 | Statistically significant, p ≤ 0.05 |
Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.
|
Irritable temperament | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months | Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) | 363 children | Adjusted mean = 2.80 | Adjusted mean = 2.84 | Mean difference = -0.04 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child's verbal ability - age 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Nurse home visiting from pregnancy to 2 years vs. control (Memphis) | 721 mother/child dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p>0.10 | |
Child's verbal ability - age 6 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting from pregnancy to 2 years vs. control (Memphis) | 721 mother/child dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | HomVEE calculated = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.10 | |
Physical aggression - age 12 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 years | Nurse home visiting from pregnancy to 2 years vs. control (Memphis) | 721 mother/child dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p>0.10 | |
Physical aggression - age 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Nurse home visiting from pregnancy to 2 years vs. control (Memphis) | 721 mother/child dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | HomVEE calculated = -0.21 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Physical aggression - age 6 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Nurse home visiting from pregnancy to 2 years vs. control (Memphis) | 721 mother/child dyads | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not available | Not statistically significant, p>0.10 |
Show findings details
Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any therapeutic services - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 165 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.22 | Unadjusted mean = 0.36 | Mean difference = -0.13 | HomVEE calculated = -0.40 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Any therapeutic services - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 155 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.39 | Unadjusted mean = 0.30 | Mean difference = 0.09 | HomVEE calculated = 0.25 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.23 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Arithmetic achievement standard score - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 164 children | Adjusted mean = 93.04 | Adjusted mean = 92.66 | Mean difference = 0.38 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.85 | |
Arithmetic achievement standard score - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 156 children | Adjusted mean = 97.11 | Adjusted mean = 96.53 | Mean difference = 0.58 | Study reported = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.77 | |
Arithmetic achievement standard score - averaged over 6 and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 156 children | Adjusted mean = 95.07 | Adjusted mean = 94.60 | Mean difference = 0.47 | Study reported = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.79 | |
Behvioral regulation in testing - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 164 children | Adjusted mean = 99.89 | Adjusted mean = 97.16 | Mean difference = 2.73 | Study reported = 0.32 | Statistically significant, p = 0.05 | |
Dysregulated aggression - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 162 children | Adjusted mean = 99.34 | Adjusted mean = 103.26 | Mean difference = -3.92 | Study reported = -0.36 | Statistically significant, p = 0.02 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Grade retention - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 155 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.11 | Unadjusted mean = 0.09 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomVEE calculated = 0.15 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.62 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Intellectual functioning - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 166 children | Adjusted mean = 96.81 | Adjusted mean = 94.85 | Mean difference = 1.96 | Study reported = 0.18 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.26 | |
Percent incoherent stories - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 162 children | Adjusted mean = 49.94 | Adjusted mean = 65.63 | Mean difference = -15.69 | Study reported = -0.50 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Reading achievement standard score - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 164 children | Adjusted mean = 96.16 | Adjusted mean = 93.40 | Mean difference = 2.76 | Study reported = 0.22 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.17 | |
Reading achievement standard score - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 156 children | Adjusted mean = 97.24 | Adjusted mean = 94.60 | Mean difference = 2.64 | Study reported = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.18 | |
Reading achievement standard score - averaged over 6 and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 156 children | Adjusted mean = 96.70 | Adjusted mean = 94.00 | Mean difference = 2.70 | Study reported = 0.22 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.13 | |
Receptive language - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 92.59 | Adjusted mean = 90.56 | Mean difference = 2.03 | Study reported = 0.16 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.28 | |
Receptive language - averaged over 2, 4, and 6 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 163 children | Adjusted mean = 90.90 | Adjusted mean = 89.01 | Mean difference = 1.89 | Study reported = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.22 | |
Special education/remedial services - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 155 children | Unadjusted mean = 0.32 | Unadjusted mean = 0.34 | Mean difference = -0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Sustained attention - 6 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (6 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 160 children | Adjusted mean = 8.71 | Adjusted mean = 8.32 | Mean difference = 0.39 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.39 | |
Sustained attention - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 153 children | Adjusted mean = 9.25 | Adjusted mean = 9.17 | Mean difference = 0.08 | Study reported = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.86 | |
Sustained attention - averaged over 4, 6, and 9 years, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 153 children | Adjusted mean = 9.21 | Adjusted mean = 8.80 | Mean difference = 0.41 | Study reported = 0.14 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.24 | |
Visual attention/task switching errors - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 154 children | Adjusted mean = 0.84 | Adjusted mean = 1.16 | Mean difference = -0.32 | Study reported = -0.30 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|
Working memory errors - 9 year, low psych resources, treatment 1 vs. 2 | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
9 years | Paraprofessional home visiting pregnancy to 2 years vs. comparison (9 year follow up, Denver); Subgroup: Mother has psychological vulnerability | 150 children | Adjusted mean = 5.79 | Adjusted mean = 5.47 | Mean difference = 0.32 | Study reported = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.46 | Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
|