Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)® Meets HHS Criteria

Last updated: October 2019

Effects Shown in Research & Outcome Measure Details

Family Economic Self-Sufficiency

Outcomes Rated High

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Number of nutritional supplementation vouchers
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
32 weeks Full (Elmira) 288 mothers Mean = 2.18 Mean = 1.56 Mean difference = 0.62 Not available Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
SES of current job (mother)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 14.01 Adjusted mean = 13.06 Mean difference = 0.95 Study reported = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 Secondary
SES of partner’s current job
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 30.83 Adjusted mean = 31.63 Mean difference = -0.80 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.70
Secondary
Has current partner (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers % (adjusted) = 78.00 Adjusted mean % = 77.00 OR = 1.10 Study reported = 0.06 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.64
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Highest grade current partner completed
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 12.16 Adjusted mean = 12.05 Mean difference = 0.11 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p = 0.45 Secondary
Lives with father of child (not married)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers % (adjusted) = 2.00 Adjusted mean % = 2.00 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.27 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.09, Significance test performed jointly
Secondary
Lives with father of study child (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers % (adjusted) = 12.00 Adjusted mean % = 10.00 OR = 1.23 Study reported = 0.12 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.45
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Married (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers % (adjusted) = 12.00 Adjusted mean % = 15.00 OR = 1.36 Study reported = -0.16 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.18
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Married to father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers % (adjusted) = 7.00 Adjusted mean % = 5.00 Mean difference = 2.00 Study reported = -0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.09, Significance test performed jointly
Secondary
Months mother employed (54–72 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 9.96 Adjusted mean = 9.99 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 0.97 Secondary
Months of AFDC (54–72 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.21 Adjusted mean = 8.96 Mean difference = -1.75 Study reported = -0.22 Statistically significant, p = 0.01 Secondary
Months of food stamps (54–72 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 9.67 Adjusted mean = 11.50 Mean difference = -1.83 Study reported = -0.24 Statistically significant, p < 0.01 Secondary
Months of Medicaid, (54–72 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 11.98 Adjusted mean = 13.08 Mean difference = -1.10 Study reported = -0.15 Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers Adjusted mean = 54.36 Adjusted mean = 45.00 Mean difference = 9.36 Study reported = 0.24 Statistically significant, p = 0.02 Secondary
Mother graduated from high school/earned GED (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 641 mothers % (adjusted) = 69.00 Adjusted mean % = 66.00 OR = 1.12 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.54
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Partnered with father of child (not married or cohabiting)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers % (adjusted) = 4.00 Adjusted mean % = 3.00 Mean difference = 1.00 Study reported = 0.25 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.09, Significance test performed jointly
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

SES of current job

Percentile rank of the mother’s occupation estimated by calculating percentile rank for each occupation using Census categories and the median income and educational achievement associated with each occupation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

SES of partner’s current job

Percentile rank of the mother’s current partner’s occupation estimated by calculating percentile rank for each occupation using Census categories and the median income and educational achievement associated with each occupation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Has current partner

Percentage of mothers who were currently in a relationship with a partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Highest grade current partner completed

The highest year of school the mother’s current partner had completed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Lives with father of study child

Percentage of mothers who lived with the father of the study’s focal child Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Married

Percentage of mothers who were married Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months mother employed

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on food stamps

Counts of the number of months the mother received food stamps Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on Medicaid

Counts of the number of months the mother received Medicaid Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months with current partner

Counts of the number of months the mother had been in a relationship with her current partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Mother graduated from high school/earned GED

Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school diploma or GED Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type

Married to father of child

Lives with father of child (not married)

Partnered with father of child (not married or cohabiting)

FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers <p>Married to father of child 7% (adjusted)</p><p>Lives with father of child (not married) 2% (adjusted)</p><p>Partnered with father of child (not married or cohabiting) 4% (adjusted)</p> <p>Married to father of child 5% (adjusted)</p><p>Lives with father of child (not married) 2% (adjusted)</p><p>Partnered with father of child (not married or cohabiting) 3% (adjusted)</p> Mean difference = 201.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.09 Significance test performed jointly
Secondary
Number of months employed per year (2–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 3.84 Adjusted mean = 3.86 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.01 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.93
Secondary
Number of months employed per year (6–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.86 Adjusted mean = 7.39 Mean difference = -0.53 Study reported = -0.15 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.13
Secondary
Number of months on /TANFper year (0–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 5.21 Adjusted mean = 5.92 Mean difference = -0.71 Study reported = -0.14 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Secondary
Number of months on TANF(6–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 3.39 Adjusted mean = 4.01 Mean difference = -0.62 Study reported = -0.12 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.12
Secondary
Number of months on food stamps per year (0–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.98 Adjusted mean = 7.80 Mean difference = -0.82 Study reported = -0.17 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Secondary
Number of months on food stamps per year (6–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.89 Adjusted mean = 5.92 Mean difference = -1.03 Study reported = -0.21 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Number of months on Medicaid per year (0–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 9.71 Adjusted mean = 10.07 Mean difference = -0.36 Study reported = -0.09 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.12
Secondary
Number of months on Medicaid per year (6–9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.79 Adjusted mean = 8.74 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.89
Secondary
Number of months with current partner (at 6 and 9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 51.89 Adjusted mean = 44.48 Mean difference = 7.41 Study reported = 0.23 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Secondary
Number of months with current partner (at 9 year postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 61.59 Adjusted mean = 52.40 Mean difference = 9.19 Study reported = 0.28 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Number of months with employed partner (at 6 and 9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 46.04 Adjusted mean = 38.43 Mean difference = 7.61 Study reported = 0.25 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Secondary
Number of months with employed partner (at 9 years postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 627 mothers Adjusted mean = 54.95 Adjusted mean = 46.01 Mean difference = 8.94 Study reported = 0.30 Statistically significant,
p = 0.01
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Lives with father of child

Percentage of unmarried mothers who lived with the father of the study’s focal child Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Married to father of child

Percentage of mothers who were married to the father of the study’s focal child Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months employed per year

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed per year Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months on AFDC/TANF per year

Counts of the number of months per year the mother received AFDC or TANF Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months on food stamps per year

Counts of the number of months per year the mother received food stamps Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months on Medicaid per year

Counts of the number of months per year the mother received Medicaid Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months with current partner

Counts of the number of months the mother had been in a relationship with her current partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months with employed partner

Counts of the number of months the mother had been in a relationship with an employed partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months with employed partner

Counts of the number of months the mother had been in a relationship with an employed partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Partnered with father of child

Percentage of mothers who were in a relationship with the father of the study’s focal child but were not married or cohabitating with them Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Educational achievement (years)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
21 months Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 427 mothers Adjusted mean = 11.51 Adjusted mean = 11.51 Mean difference = 0.00 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Educational achievement

The highest year of school the mother had completed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Educational achievement

The highest year of school the mother had completed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months employed

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed. The outcome was measured for the periods of 1 to 12 months postpartum and 13 to 24 months postpartum. Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC. The outcome was measured for the periods of 1 to 12 months postpartum and 13 to 24 months postpartum. Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Graduated from high school or earned GED
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers = 0.80 = 0.76 OR = 1.26 HomeVEE calculated = 0.14 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.35
Secondary
Lives with father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers = 0.41 = 0.43 OR = 0.92 HomeVEE calculated = -0.05 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.69
Secondary
Lives with partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers = 0.58 = 0.61 OR = 0.90 HomeVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.61
Secondary
Married
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers = 0.39 = 0.44 OR = 0.80 HomeVEE calculated = -0.14 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.28
Secondary
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers Adjusted mean = 14.42 Adjusted mean = 13.38 Mean difference = 1.04 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.22
Secondary
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.88 Adjusted mean = 2.10 Mean difference = -0.22 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.69
Secondary
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.32 Adjusted mean = 3.98 Mean difference = 0.34 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.67
Secondary
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.34 Adjusted mean = 6.98 Mean difference = 0.36 Study reported = -0.03 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.71
Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 424 mothers Adjusted mean = 19.92 Adjusted mean = 20.14 Mean difference = -0.22 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.81
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Graduated from high school or earned GED

Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school diploma or GED Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Lives with father of child

Percentage of mothers who lived with the father of the study’s focal child Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Lives with partner

Percentage of mothers who lived with their current partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Married

Percentage of mothers who were married Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)

Counts of the number of months the mother received food stamps Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)

Counts of the number of months the mother received Medicaid Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months with current partner

Counts of the number of months the mother had been in a relationship with her current partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Economically productive
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) 231 children % (adjusted) = 71.00 Adjusted mean % = 68.00 Difference = 0.03 HomeVEE calculated = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Economically productive
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 219 children %(adjusted) = 73.00 Adjusted mean % = 68.00 Difference = 0.04 HomeVEE calculated = 0.13 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Ever used AFDC
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) 231 children % (adjusted) = 3.00 Adjusted mean % = 2.00 Difference = 0.01 HomeVEE calculated = 0.26 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Ever used AFDC
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 219 children %(adjusted) = 6.00 Adjusted mean % = 2.00 Difference = 0.04 HomeVEE calculated = -0.68 Statistically significant, p < 0.05 Secondary
Ever used food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) 231 children %(adjusted) = 6.00 Adjusted mean % = 6.00 Difference = 0.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Ever used food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 219 children %(adjusted) = 7.00 Adjusted mean % = 6.00 Difference = 0.01 HomeVEE calculated = 0.06 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Ever used Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and comparison (Elmira) 231 children %(adjusted) = 11.00 Adjusted mean % = 12.00 Difference = -0.01 HomeVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Ever used Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
19-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 219 children %(adjusted) = 20.00 Adjusted mean % = 12.00 Difference = 0.07 HomeVEE calculated = 0.34 Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Economically productive

Percentage of youth engaging in economically productive activities such as whether the youth was in school, the military, or job training or working full time at the time of the interview Adolescent report

Not applicable

Secondary

Ever used AFDC

Percentage of youth that had received AFDC Adolescent report

Not applicable

Secondary

Ever used food stamps

Percentage of youth that had received food stamps Adolescent report

Not applicable

Secondary

Ever used Medicaid

Percentage of youth that had received Medicaid Adolescent report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Current socioeconomic status (percentile ranked by U.S. occupational codes)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.62 Adjusted mean = 13.73 Mean difference = 1.89 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Highest education level
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 11.61 Adjusted mean = 11.67 Mean difference = -0.06 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Living with father of child (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers % (adjusted) = 19.00 Adjusted mean % = 13.00 OR = 1.68 HomeVEE calculated = 0.29 Statistically significant,
p = 0.03
Secondary
Living with partner (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers % (adjusted) = 43.00 Adjusted mean % = 32.00 OR = 1.64 HomeVEE calculated = 0.27 Statistically significant,
p < 0.01
Secondary
Married (percentage)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers % (adjusted) = 15.00 Adjusted mean % = 10.00 OR = 1.56 HomeVEE calculated = 0.28 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.09
Secondary
Number of months current partner employed
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 35.15 Adjusted mean = 26.45 Mean difference = 8.70 Not available Statistically significant,
p = 0.04
Secondary
Number of months mother or child received AFDC (0–60 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 32.55 Adjusted mean = 36.19 Mean difference = -3.64 Not available Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.01
Primary
Number of months mother or child received food stamps (0–60 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 41.57 Adjusted mean = 45.04 Mean difference = -3.47 Not available Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.01
Primary
Number of months received WIC (0–54 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 21.51 Adjusted mean = 23.33 Mean difference = -1.82 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of months received Medicaid (0–54 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 39.59 Adjusted mean = 41.08 Mean difference = -1.49 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of months worked (0–54 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
3-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 646 mothers Adjusted mean = 19.89 Adjusted mean = 18.84 Mean difference = 1.05 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Current SES

Percentile rank of the mother’s occupation estimated by calculating percentile rank for each occupation using Census categories and the median income and educational achievement associated with each occupation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Highest education level

The highest year of school the mother had completed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Living with father of child

Percentage of mothers who were living with the father of their child Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Living with partner

Percentage of mothers who were living with their partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Married

Percentage of mothers who were married Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months current partner employed

Counts of the number of months the mother’s current partner was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months mother or child received AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC Review of Tennessee Department of Human Services records

Not applicable

Primary

Number of months mother or child received food stamps

Counts of the number of months the mother received food stamps. The outcome was measured for the period of 0 to 60 months postpartum. Review of Tennessee Department of Human Services records

Not applicable

Primary

Number of months received WIC

Counts of the number of months the mother received WIC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months received Medicaid

Counts of the number of months the mother received Medicaid Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months worked

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
Employed during pregnancy
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
36th week of pregnancy Full (Memphis) 916 mothers % (adjusted) = 6.00 Adjusted mean % = 3.00 OR = 2.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.44 Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Secondary

footnote3

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Authors report the difference in this outcome to be statistically significant, p < 0.10, which is greater than the acceptable alpha for this review (&alpha; = 0.05).

In school during pregnancy
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
36th week of pregnancy Full (Memphis) 916 mothers % (adjusted) = 44.00 Adjusted mean % = 41.00 OR = 1.20 HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Months on AFDC , 13–24 months postpartum
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
2 years postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 671 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.80 Adjusted mean = 8.40 Mean difference = -0.60 Not available Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Primary

footnote3

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Authors report the difference in this outcome to be statistically significant, p < 0.10, which is greater than the acceptable alpha for this review (&alpha; = 0.05).

Months on AFDC , 0–12 months postpartum
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
2 years postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 681 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.30 Adjusted mean = 7.60 Mean difference = -0.30 Not available Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Primary
Months worked, 0–12 months postpartum
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
2 years postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 681 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.20 Adjusted mean = 1.70 Mean difference = 0.50 Not available Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Secondary
Months worked, 13–24 months postpartum
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
2 years postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and developmental screening comparison (Memphis) 671 mothers Adjusted mean = 3.40 Adjusted mean = 3.40 Mean difference = 0.00 Not available Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Secondary
Used other community services
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
36th week of pregnancy Full (Memphis) 916 mothers % (adjusted) = 29.00 Adjusted mean % = 20.00 OR = 1.80 HomeVEE calculated = 0.30 Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.01
Secondary

footnote2

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance reported on authors’ calculations of the odds ratio.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Employed during pregnancy

Percentage of women who were employed at 28 weeks gestation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

In school during pregnancy

Percentage of women who were enrolled in school at 28 weeks gestation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC Review of Tennessee Department of Human Services records

Not applicable

Primary

Months worked

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Used other community services

Percentage of women who used other community services at 28 weeks’ gestation Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Months employed
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 227 mothers Adjusted mean = 87.50 Adjusted mean = 89.70 Mean difference = -2.20 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Months employed
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 245 mothers Adjusted mean = 96.40 Adjusted mean = 89.70 Mean difference = 6.70 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months receiving AFDC
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 227 mothers Adjusted mean = 70.20 Adjusted mean = 65.90 Mean difference = 4.30 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Months receiving AFDC
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 245 mothers Adjusted mean = 52.80 Adjusted mean = 65.90 Mean difference = -13.10 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months receiving food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 227 mothers Adjusted mean = 62.00 Adjusted mean = 56.40 Mean difference = 5.60 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Months receiving food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy, and comparison (Elmira) 245 mothers Adjusted mean = 47.90 Adjusted mean = 56.40 Mean difference = -8.50 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months receiving Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 227 mothers Adjusted mean = 71.10 Adjusted mean = 70.00 Mean difference = 1.10 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Months receiving Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 245 mothers Adjusted mean = 61.80 Adjusted mean = 70.00 Mean difference = -8.20 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Months employed

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed between the child’s birth and 15th year of life Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months receiving AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC between the child’s birth and 15th year of life Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months receiving food stamps

Counts of the number of months the mother received food stamps between the child’s birth and 15th year of life Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months receiving Medicaid

Counts of the number of months the mother received Medicaid between the child’s birth and 15th year of life Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Concern about finding work
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 195 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.43 Adjusted mean = 2.17 Mean difference = 0.26 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Concern about finding work
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 202 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.38 Adjusted mean = 2.17 Mean difference = 0.21 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Concern about finding work
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 192 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.97 Adjusted mean = 1.92 Mean difference = 0.05 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Concern about finding work
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 183 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.24 Adjusted mean = 1.92 Mean difference = 0.32 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 197 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.77 Adjusted mean = 2.64 Mean difference = 0.13 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 204 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.76 Adjusted mean = 2.64 Mean difference = 0.12 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 189 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.94 Adjusted mean = 2.76 Mean difference = 0.18 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 197 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.83 Adjusted mean = 2.76 Mean difference = 0.07 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
46 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 167 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.97 Adjusted mean = 3.00 Mean difference = -0.03 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Help with child care
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
46 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 183 mothers Adjusted mean = 3.18 Adjusted mean = 3.00 Mean difference = 0.18 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of days on public assistance (0–22 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 185 mothers Adjusted mean = 268.00 Adjusted mean = 244.00 Mean difference = 24.00 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Number of days on public assistance (0–22 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 194 mothers Adjusted mean = 236.00 Adjusted mean = 244.00 Mean difference = -8.00 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of days on public assistance (0–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
48 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 196 mothers Adjusted mean = 510.00 Adjusted mean = 530.00 Mean difference = -20.00 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Number of days on public assistance (0–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
48 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 208 mothers Adjusted mean = 437.00 Adjusted mean = 530.00 Mean difference = -93.00 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of months employed (0–22 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 194 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.15 Adjusted mean = 5.89 Mean difference = 0.26 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Number of months employed (0–22 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
22 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 185 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.57 Adjusted mean = 5.89 Mean difference = 1.68 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Number of months employed (0–46 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
46 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy and comparison (Elmira) 196 mothers Adjusted mean = 17.01 Adjusted mean = 12.65 Mean difference = 4.36 Not available Statistical significance not reported Secondary
Number of months employed (0–46 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
46 months postpartum Nurse visited during pregnancy + infancy and comparison (Elmira) 208 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.18 Adjusted mean = 12.65 Mean difference = 2.53 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Concern about finding work

Likert scale with a range of 1 to 4 indicating frequency of worrying about finding work Parent/caregiver report

Not reported by author

Secondary

Help with child care

Scale ranging from 1 to 4 based on average frequency of help with specific child care tasks (e.g., diaper changing, dressing, toilet training, feeding, playing) provided by other family members and friends Parent/caregiver report

Not reported by author

Secondary

Number of days on public assistance

Counts of the number of days the mother was on public assistance Review of county records for mothers that were at-risk or reported use of public assistance and had not moved out of the county during the period. Otherwise, parent/caregiver report was used.

Not applicable

Secondary

Number of months employed

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Duration of current partner relationship
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 77.44 Adjusted mean = 70.80 Mean difference = 6.64 HomeVEE calculated = 2.07 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Secondary
Duration of current partner relationship
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6-, 9-, 12-year follow-ups Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 59.58 Adjusted mean = 52.67 Mean difference = 6.91 HomeVEE calculated = 3.55 Statistically significant, p < .05 Secondary
Partnered with child's biological father
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12-year follow-up Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers %(adjusted) = 10.00 Adjusted mean % = 7.00 OR = 1.51 HomeVEE calculated = 0.24 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Secondary
Time employed, in months
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 7.10 Adjusted mean = 7.77 Mean difference = -0.67 HomeVEE calculated = -2.62 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Secondary
Time employed, in months
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
2 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.50 Adjusted mean = 4.64 Mean difference = -0.14 HomeVEE calculated = -0.99 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Secondary
Use of AFDC-TANF
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
0 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.97 Adjusted mean = 5.47 Mean difference = -0.50 HomeVEE calculated = -3.03 Statistically significant, p < .05 Primary
Use of AFDC-TANF
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 3.75 Adjusted mean = 3.97 Mean difference = -0.22 HomeVEE calculated = -13.10 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Primary
Use of food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
0 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.27 Adjusted mean = 6.86 Mean difference = -0.59 HomeVEE calculated = -3.90 Statistically significant, p < .05 Primary
Use of food stamps
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.46 Adjusted mean = 5.06 Mean difference = -0.60 HomeVEE calculated = -2.65 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Primary
Use of Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
0 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.08 Adjusted mean = 8.39 Mean difference = -0.31 HomeVEE calculated = -1.88 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Primary
Use of Medicaid
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
10 to 12 years Nurse visited during pregnancy and infancy and development screening comparison (Memphis) 594 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.02 Adjusted mean = 6.23 Mean difference = -0.21 HomeVEE calculated = -0.81 Not statistically significant, p > .05 Primary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Duration of current partner relationship

Count of the number of months the mother has been in a relationship with her current partner Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Partnered with child's biological father

Percentage of mothers that were partnered with or married to the study child’s biologic father at the 12-year interview Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Time employed, in months

Count of the number of months the mother was employed from child age 2 to 12 years Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable 

Secondary

Use of AFDC-TANF

Count of the number of months per year the mother Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families from birth through child age 12 years Review of state records supplemented by parent/caregiver report

Not applicable 

Primary

Use of food stamps

Count of the number of months per year the mother received food stamps from birth through child age 12 years Review of state records supplemented by parent/caregiver report

Not applicable 

Primary

Use of Medicaid

Count of the number of months per year the mother received Medicaid from birth through age child age 12 years Review of state records supplemented by parent/caregiver report

Not applicable 

Primary
NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Educational achievement (years)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
21 months Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 440 mothers Adjusted mean = 11.62 Adjusted mean = 11.51 Mean difference = 0.11 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months employed (1–12 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 months Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 425 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.21 Adjusted mean = 3.97 Mean difference = 0.24 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months employed (13–24 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 439 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.14 Adjusted mean = 5.73 Mean difference = 0.41 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months on AFDC (1–12 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 months Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 425 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.60 Adjusted mean = 2.35 Mean difference = 0.25 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months on AFDC (13–24 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 439 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.31 Adjusted mean = 1.92 Mean difference = 0.39 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary

Outcomes Rated Moderate

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 569 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.54 Unadjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.04 p = 0.78 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15 years Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 183 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.48 Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Mean difference = 0.42 Study reported = 0.42 p = 0.03 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 205 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.32 Unadjusted mean = 0.45 Mean difference = -0.13 Study reported = -0.12 p = 0.54 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 657 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.30 Unadjusted mean = 2.21 Mean difference = 0.09 Study reported = 0.05 p = 0.7 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 214 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.36 Unadjusted mean = 0.44 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.07 p = 0.72 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 414 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.10 Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.04 p = 0.72 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
54 months Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 626 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.40 Unadjusted mean = 2.28 Mean difference = 0.12 Study reported = 0.06 p = 0.63 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 627 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.86 Unadjusted mean = 2.04 Mean difference = -0.18 Study reported = -0.11 p = 0.38 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 394 mothers Unadjusted mean = -0.01 Unadjusted mean = -0.08 Mean difference = 0.07 Study reported = 0.12 p = 0.34 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 617 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.93 Unadjusted mean = 1.93 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00 p = 0.99 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 357 mothers Unadjusted mean = -0.15 Unadjusted mean = -0.17 Mean difference = 0.02 Study reported = 0.03 p = 0.84 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Neighborhood Disadvantage index

Weighted average of the standardized values for the following percentages within Census tract and block group: (1) households below the federal poverty level (2) persons on public assistance (3) female-headed households with children (4) persons unemployed, and (5) share of population that is black. U.S. Census Bureau - 1980, 1990, and 2000 censuses

Not reported by authors

Primary

Neighborhood Disadvantage index

An average of the standardized values for five elements in each Census tract and block group number: (1) percentage of households below the federal poverty level, (2) percentage of persons on public assistance, (3) percentage of female-headed households with children, (4) percentage of persons unemployed, (5) percentage of population that is black. This average was weighted by intervals between the Censuses when participant assessments were conducted. The weighted scores represent the degree of concentrated disadvantage in the neighborhood in terms of national averages, weighted by intervals to the Census. Author calculation from public data

Not reported by author

Primary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 569 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.54 Unadjusted mean = 1.60 Mean difference = -0.06 Study reported = -0.04 p = 0.78 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15 years Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 183 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.48 Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Mean difference = 0.42 Study reported = 0.42 p = 0.03 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 205 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.32 Unadjusted mean = 0.45 Mean difference = -0.13 Study reported = -0.12 p = 0.54 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 657 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.30 Unadjusted mean = 2.21 Mean difference = 0.09 Study reported = 0.05 p = 0.7 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Elmira, NY- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 214 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.36 Unadjusted mean = 0.44 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.07 p = 0.72 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 414 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.10 Unadjusted mean = 0.06 Mean difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.04 p = 0.72 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
54 months Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 626 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.40 Unadjusted mean = 2.28 Mean difference = 0.12 Study reported = 0.06 p = 0.63 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 627 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.86 Unadjusted mean = 2.04 Mean difference = -0.18 Study reported = -0.11 p = 0.38 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 394 mothers Unadjusted mean = -0.01 Unadjusted mean = -0.08 Mean difference = 0.07 Study reported = 0.12 p = 0.34 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9 years Memphis, TN - Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 617 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.93 Unadjusted mean = 1.93 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00 p = 0.99 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
9 years Denver, CO- Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) 357 mothers Unadjusted mean = -0.15 Unadjusted mean = -0.17 Mean difference = 0.02 Study reported = 0.03 p = 0.84 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Neighborhood Disadvantage index

Weighted average of the standardized values for the following percentages within Census tract and block group: (1) households below the federal poverty level (2) persons on public assistance (3) female-headed households with children (4) persons unemployed, and (5) share of population that is black. U.S. Census Bureau - 1980, 1990, and 2000 censuses

Not reported by authors

Primary

Neighborhood Disadvantage index

An average of the standardized values for five elements in each Census tract and block group number: (1) percentage of households below the federal poverty level, (2) percentage of persons on public assistance, (3) percentage of female-headed households with children, (4) percentage of persons unemployed, (5) percentage of population that is black. This average was weighted by intervals between the Censuses when participant assessments were conducted. The weighted scores represent the degree of concentrated disadvantage in the neighborhood in terms of national averages, weighted by intervals to the Census. Author calculation from public data

Not reported by author

Primary
Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Months employed (1–12 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 months Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 406 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.35 Adjusted mean = 3.97 Mean difference = 0.38 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months employed (13–24 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 419 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.87 Adjusted mean = 5.73 Mean difference = 1.14 Not available Statistically significant,
p ≤ 0.05
Secondary
Months on AFDC (1–12 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 months Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 406 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.31 Adjusted mean = 2.35 Mean difference = -0.04 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Months on AFDC (13–24 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Nurse home visitor and comparison (Denver) 419 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.95 Adjusted mean = 1.92 Mean difference = 0.03 Not available Not statistically significant,
p ≥ 0.05
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Description Collection method Properties Outcome Type Operations links

Months employed

Counts of the number of months the mother was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary

Months on AFDC

Counts of the number of months the mother received AFDC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Secondary
NFP with Nurse Home Visitors - Mothers with low psychological resources subgroup
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 years Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 308 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.03 Unadjusted mean = 1.74 Mean difference = 0.29 Study reported = 0.19 p = 0.11 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15 years Elmira, NYNurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - high risk (unmarried, low SES) 78 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.57 Unadjusted mean = 0.52 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.04 p = 0.86 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 338 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.48 Unadjusted mean = 2.51 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = -0.02 p = 0.88 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Elmira, NYNurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - high risk (unmarried, low SES) 100 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.83 Unadjusted mean = 0.91 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.06 p = 0.79 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Denver, CONurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 152 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.18 Unadjusted mean = 0.40 Mean difference = -0.22 Study reported = -0.23 p = 0.16 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
54 months Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 325 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.52 Unadjusted mean = 2.71 Mean difference = -0.19 Study reported = -0.11 p = 0.35 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 332 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.84 Unadjusted mean = 2.34 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.30 p = 0.01 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
NFP with Nurse Home Visitors - Mothers with low psychological resources subgroup
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type Notes
Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
12 years Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 308 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.03 Unadjusted mean = 1.74 Mean difference = 0.29 Study reported = 0.19 p = 0.11 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
15 years Elmira, NYNurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - high risk (unmarried, low SES) 78 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.57 Unadjusted mean = 0.52 Mean difference = 0.05 Study reported = 0.04 p = 0.86 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
24 months Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 338 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.48 Unadjusted mean = 2.51 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = -0.02 p = 0.88 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Elmira, NYNurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - high risk (unmarried, low SES) 100 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.83 Unadjusted mean = 0.91 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.06 p = 0.79 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4 years Denver, CONurseFamily Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 152 mothers Unadjusted mean = 0.18 Unadjusted mean = 0.40 Mean difference = -0.22 Study reported = -0.23 p = 0.16 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
54 months Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 325 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.52 Unadjusted mean = 2.71 Mean difference = -0.19 Study reported = -0.11 p = 0.35 Primary

footnote162

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

Neighborhood Disadvantage index
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
6 years Memphis, TN Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) - low psychological resources 332 mothers Unadjusted mean = 2.84 Unadjusted mean = 2.34 Mean difference = 0.50 Study reported = 0.30 p = 0.01 Primary

footnote163

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.

Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Graduated from high school or earned GED
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.82 = 0.76 OR = 1.39 HomeVEE calculated = 0.20 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.18
Secondary
Lives with father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.33 = 0.43 OR = 0.64 HomeVEE calculated = -0.27 Statistically significant,
p = 0.03
Secondary
Lives with partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.52 = 0.61 OR = 0.70 HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.08
Secondary
Married
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.32 = 0.44 OR = 0.61 HomeVEE calculated = -0.31 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.13 Adjusted mean = 13.38 Mean difference = 1.75 Study reported = 0.11 Statistically significant,
p = 0.04
Secondary
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.95 Adjusted mean = 2.10 Mean difference = -0.15 Study reported = -0.19 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.78
Secondary
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.56 Adjusted mean = 3.98 Mean difference = 0.58 Study reported = 0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.47
Secondary
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.08 Adjusted mean = 6.98 Mean difference = 1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.26
Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 20.03 Adjusted mean = 20.14 Mean difference = -0.11 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.91
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Graduated from high school or earned GED
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.82 = 0.76 OR = 1.39 HomeVEE calculated = 0.20 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.18
Secondary
Lives with father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.33 = 0.43 OR = 0.64 HomeVEE calculated = -0.27 Statistically significant,
p = 0.03
Secondary
Lives with partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.52 = 0.61 OR = 0.70 HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.08
Secondary
Married
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.32 = 0.44 OR = 0.61 HomeVEE calculated = -0.31 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.13 Adjusted mean = 13.38 Mean difference = 1.75 Study reported = 0.11 Statistically significant,
p = 0.04
Secondary
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.95 Adjusted mean = 2.10 Mean difference = -0.15 Study reported = -0.19 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.78
Secondary
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.56 Adjusted mean = 3.98 Mean difference = 0.58 Study reported = 0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.47
Secondary
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.08 Adjusted mean = 6.98 Mean difference = 1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.26
Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 20.03 Adjusted mean = 20.14 Mean difference = -0.11 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.91
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Graduated from high school or earned GED
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.82 = 0.76 OR = 1.39 HomeVEE calculated = 0.20 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.18
Secondary
Lives with father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.33 = 0.43 OR = 0.64 HomeVEE calculated = -0.27 Statistically significant,
p = 0.03
Secondary
Lives with partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.52 = 0.61 OR = 0.70 HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.08
Secondary
Married
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.32 = 0.44 OR = 0.61 HomeVEE calculated = -0.31 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.13 Adjusted mean = 13.38 Mean difference = 1.75 Study reported = 0.11 Statistically significant,
p = 0.04
Secondary
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.95 Adjusted mean = 2.10 Mean difference = -0.15 Study reported = -0.19 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.78
Secondary
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.56 Adjusted mean = 3.98 Mean difference = 0.58 Study reported = 0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.47
Secondary
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.08 Adjusted mean = 6.98 Mean difference = 1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.26
Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 20.03 Adjusted mean = 20.14 Mean difference = -0.11 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.91
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
NFP with Paraprofessional Home Visitors
Show Study Effects Details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up Timing Sample Sample Size Program Group Comparison Group Group Difference Effect size Statistical significance Outcome Type
Graduated from high school or earned GED
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.82 = 0.76 OR = 1.39 HomeVEE calculated = 0.20 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.18
Secondary
Lives with father of child
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.33 = 0.43 OR = 0.64 HomeVEE calculated = -0.27 Statistically significant,
p = 0.03
Secondary
Lives with partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.52 = 0.61 OR = 0.70 HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.08
Secondary
Married
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers = 0.32 = 0.44 OR = 0.61 HomeVEE calculated = -0.31 Statistically significant,
p = 0.02
Secondary
Months mother employed (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 15.13 Adjusted mean = 13.38 Mean difference = 1.75 Study reported = 0.11 Statistically significant,
p = 0.04
Secondary
Months of AFDC (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.95 Adjusted mean = 2.10 Mean difference = -0.15 Study reported = -0.19 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.78
Secondary
Months of food stamps (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.56 Adjusted mean = 3.98 Mean difference = 0.58 Study reported = 0.21 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.47
Secondary
Months of Medicaid (25–48 months postpartum)
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 8.08 Adjusted mean = 6.98 Mean difference = 1.10 Study reported = 0.02 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.26
Secondary
Months with current partner
FavorableUnfavorableNo Effect
4-year follow-up Paraprofessional home visitor and comparison (Denver) 431 mothers Adjusted mean = 20.03 Adjusted mean = 20.14 Mean difference = -0.11 Study reported = 0.07 Not statistically significant,
p = 0.91
Secondary
Show Study Outcome Measure Summary
View Revisions