Healthy Families America (HFA)® Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2020

Effects shown in research & outcome measure details

Family economic self-sufficiency

Findings rated high

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Has health care coverage
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 2 Children in custody of biological mother at interview, Alaska trial 249 children % (adjusted) = 95.00 Adjusted mean % = 90.00 OR = 2.05 HomeVEE calculated = 0.45 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Has health care coverage

Percentage of children who had health care coverage

Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Percentage of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 years

Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample

2707 children Percent = 0.83 Percent = 0.83 Odds ratio = 1.01 HomeVEE calculated = 0.01

Not statistically significant, p= 0.93

Effect size based on study OR

Submitted by barbara on Fri, 04/12/2019 - 18:55

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (children)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 years

Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample

2707 children Days = 519.20 Days = 524.80 Mean difference = -5.60 HomeVEE calculated = -0.02

Not statistically significant, p= 0.61

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Percentage of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan

Percent of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP)

Administrative data

Not reported by author

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (children)

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) for children

Administrative data

Not reported by author

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
WIC receipt
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 91.00 % = 91.00 = 0.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
WIC receipt
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 68.00 % = 71.00 = -3.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Adult education
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 23.00 % = 21.00 = 2.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Adult education
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 22.00 % = 21.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Child has insurance coverage
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 children % = 84.20 % = 87.20 = -3.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.15 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote55

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

This study was assigned a moderate rating for this outcome due to statistically significant differences between the program and comparison groups at baseline.

Child has insurance coverage
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children % = 82.40 % = 84.00 = -1.60 HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Child support enforcement
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 10.00 % = 16.00 = -6.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.33 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Child support enforcement
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 14.00 % = 12.00 = 2.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.11 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Emergency food
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 13.00 % = 9.00 = 4.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.25 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote61

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

In contrast to the study-reported results, HomVEE calculations showed this difference to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The HomVEE tests of statistical significance are based on the HomVEE calculated effect sizes, whereas authors may have used other techniques to determine statistical significance, such as regression models or analyses of variance (ANOVA).

Emergency food
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 11.00 % = 8.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.21 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Food stamps
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 59.00 % = 58.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Food stamps
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 43.00 % = 44.00 = -1.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Homeless shelter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 2.00 % = 1.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.43 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Homeless shelter
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 1.00 % = 1.00 = 0.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Legal aid
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 7.00 % = 6.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.10 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Legal aid
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 7.00 % = 4.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.36 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother earned HS degree or currently enrolled
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 64.00 % = 61.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother earned HS degree or currently enrolled
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 58.00 % = 59.00 = -1.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother attended school
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 43.00 % = 40.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother attended school
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 37.00 % = 28.00 = 9.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.25 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Mother worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 49.00 % = 49.00 = 0.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 69.00 % = 70.00 = -1.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Section 8 housing
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 8.00 % = 11.00 = -3.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote61

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

In contrast to the study-reported results, HomVEE calculations showed this difference to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The HomVEE tests of statistical significance are based on the HomVEE calculated effect sizes, whereas authors may have used other techniques to determine statistical significance, such as regression models or analyses of variance (ANOVA).

Section 8 housing
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 10.00 % = 7.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.24 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Someone in household worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 74.00 % = 71.00 = 3.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Someone in household worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 84.00 % = 83.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Use of respite care
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 3.00 % = 1.00 = 2.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.68 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Use of respite care
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 2.00 % = 1.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.43 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Welfare receipt
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 435 families % = 62.00 % = 63.00 = -1.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Welfare receipt
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 families % = 43.00 % = 46.00 = -3.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

WIC receipt

Percentage of families who received WIC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Adult education

Percentage of parents who received adult education or job training Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Child has insurance coverage

Percentage of children who had health insurance coverage

Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Child support enforcement

Percentage of families who received child support enforcement assistance Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Emergency food

Percentage of families who received emergency food assistance Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Food stamps

Percentage of families who received food stamps Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Homeless shelter

Percentage of families who received homeless shelter services Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Legal aid

Percentage of families who received legal aid Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Mother earned high school degree or currently enrolled

Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school degree or who were currently enrolled in school Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Mother attended school

Percentage of mothers who were attending school Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Mother worked

Percentage of mothers who were employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Section 8 housing

Percentage of families who received Section 8 housing assistance Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Someone in household worked

Percentage of families in which a household member was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Use of respite care

Percentage of families who used respite care Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Welfare receipt

Percentage of families who received AFDC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance

Job training or employment

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months

HFA vs. comparison group, Arizona, full sample

199 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.49 Unadjusted proportion = 0.52 Mean difference = -0.03 Study reported = 0.09

Not statistically significant, p= 0.54

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Job training or employment

Received job training or employment by follow-up

Parent/caregiver report

Not reported by author

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Mother earned HS degree or in school
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, Hawaii trial 564 mothers % = 81.00 % = 80.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Mother earned HS degree or in school
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 2 Full sample, Hawaii trial 567 mothers % = 82.00 % = 81.00 = 1.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Someone in household worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, Hawaii trial 564 mothers % = 68.00 % = 70.00 = -2.00 HomeVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Someone in household worked
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 2 Full sample, Hawaii trial 567 mothers % = 77.00 % = 75.00 = 2.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Mother earned high school degree or in school

Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school degree or who were currently enrolled in school Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Someone in household worked

Percentage of families in which a household member was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Number of days on TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted mean = 176.10 Unadjusted mean = 169.60 Mean difference = 6.50 HomeVEE calculated = 0.03 Not statistically significant, p = 0.51

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Number of days on SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted mean = 475.10 Unadjusted mean = 461.20 Mean difference = 13.90 HomeVEE calculated = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p = 0.20

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Number of days with child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted mean = 19.50 Unadjusted mean = 19.80 Mean difference = -0.30 HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p = 0.92

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Percentage ever received TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.42 Unadjusted proportion = 0.41 Mean difference = 0.01 HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.56

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Percentage ever received child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 Mean difference = -0.01 HomeVEE calculated = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p = 0.33

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Percentage ever received SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.85 Unadjusted proportion = 0.82 Mean difference = 0.02 HomeVEE calculated = 0.10 Statistically significant, p = 0.01

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Number of days on TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Total number of days receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Number of days on SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Total number of days receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Number of days with child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Total number of days receiving child care subsidies or benefits (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Percentage ever received TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Percentage of mothers who were enrolled in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Percentage ever received child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Percentage of mothers who received a child care subsidy or benefit at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Percentage ever received SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Percentage of mothers who were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
School or training for mother
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
12 months Arizona sample 171 mothers Mean % = 35.20 Mean % = 6.80 Mean difference = 0.28 HomeVEE calculated = 1.19 Statistically significant, p = 0.01
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

School or training for mother

A measure of whether the participant had enrolled and was attending training or school for advancement Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Findings rated moderate

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Percentage of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 years

Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample

2707 parents Percent = 0.84 Percent = 0.84 Odds ratio = 1.03 HomeVEE calculated = 0.02

Not statistically significant, p= 0.77

Effect size based on study OR

Submitted by barbara on Fri, 04/12/2019 - 18:55

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (parents)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 years

Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample

2707 parents Days = 381.40 Days = 380.10 Mean difference = 1.30 HomeVEE calculated = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p= 0.62

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties
Percentage of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan

Percent of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP)

Administrative data

Not reported by author

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (parents)

Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) for parent

Administrative data

Not reported by author

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Child has health insurance
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY Trial 1061 children % = 93.90 % = 90.40 = 3.50 HomeVEE calculated = 0.30 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Education appropriate for age
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY trial 1061 families % = 57.50 % = 60.30 = -2.80 HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Family received TANF
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY trial 1061 families % = 35.00 % = 30.40 = 4.60 HomeVEE calculated = 0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Family received WIC
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY trial 1061 families % = 74.80 % = 72.20 = 2.60 HomeVEE calculated = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Family received 50% income from work
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY trial 1061 families % = 51.20 % = 56.60 = -5.40 HomeVEE calculated = -0.13 Not statistically significant,
p > 0.05
Mother employed
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY trial 1061 families % = 40.80 % = 47.60 = 6.80 HomeVEE calculated = -0.17 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Mother has health insurance
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, NY Trial 1061 mothers % (adjusted) = 80.10 Adjusted mean % = 78.40 = 1.70 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Child has health insurance

Percentage of children who had health insurance coverage

Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Family received WIC

Percentage of families who received WIC Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Family received TANF

Percentage of households that received TANF Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Family received 50% income from work

Percentage of households in which 50% of the household’s income came from work Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Mother employed

Percentage of mothers who were employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Mother has health insurance

Percentage of mothers who had health insurance coverage

Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Increased education by year or more since baseline
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
24 months Program group families not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
512 families % = 18.40 % = 7.40 OR = 2.50 HomeVEE calculated = 0.63 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Receipt of public assistance
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
24 months Program group families not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
512 families Not available Not available Beta = 0.02 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

footnote62

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Study reports results using a standardized partial regression coefficient.

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Receipt of public assistance

Percentage of households receiving public assistance Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Number of days with employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted mean = 98.90 Unadjusted mean = 94.40 Mean difference = 4.50 HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 Not statistically significant, p = 0.53

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Percentage ever received employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years Oregon, 2010-2012 2707 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.31 Unadjusted proportion = 0.30 Mean difference = 0.00 HomeVEE calculated = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p = 0.77

footnote318

Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29

Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations.

Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Number of days with employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Total number of days receiving employment services provided through the Oregon Department of Human Services (primarily related to TANF program), at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Percentage ever received employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted

Percentage of mothers who received employment services provided through the Oregon Department of Human Services (primarily related to TANF program), at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. Administrative records

Not applicable

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Completed at least 1 year of college - 2 years
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years post enrollment MA sample 604 mothers Not reported Not reported OR = 1.92 HomeVEE calculated = 0.39 Statistically significant, p < 0.01
High school diploma or equivalent - 2 years
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
2 years post enrollment MA sample 604 mothers Not reported Not reported OR = 0.87 HomeVEE calculated = -0.08 Not statistically significant, p = 0.52
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Completed at least 1 year of college - 2 years

Percentage of mothers whose highest level of education at the 2-year follow-up was completion of at least 1 year of college Mother self-report

Not reported

High school diploma or equivalent - 2 years

Percentage of mothers whose highest level of education at the 2-year follow-up was completion of high school or equivalent Mother self-report

Not reported

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Household income above poverty level
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 2 Biological mothers with custody of index child at interview, Alaska trial 249 mothers % = 55.00 % = 56.00 OR = 0.97 HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Household member employed
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 2 Biological mothers with custody of index child at interview, Alaska trial 249 mothers % = 86.00 % = 87.00 OR = 0.90 HomeVEE calculated = -0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Show outcome measure summary
Outcome measure Outcome measure description Collection method Properties

Household income above poverty level

Percentage of households with incomes below the poverty level Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

Household member employed

Percentage of households where at least one household member was employed Parent/caregiver report

Not applicable

View Revisions