Effect size based on study OR
HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2020
Effects shown in research & outcome measure details
Family economic self-sufficiency
Findings rated high
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has health care coverage | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 2 | Children in custody of biological mother at interview, Alaska trial | 249 children | % (adjusted) = 95.00 | Adjusted mean % = 90.00 | OR = 2.05 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.45 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Has health care coverage |
Percentage of children who had health care coverage |
Parent/caregiver report |
Not applicable |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample |
2707 children | Percent = 0.83 | Percent = 0.83 | Odds ratio = 1.01 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.01 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.93 |
|
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (children) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample |
2707 children | Days = 519.20 | Days = 524.80 | Mean difference = -5.60 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.61 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan |
Percent of children ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) |
Administrative data |
Not reported by author |
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (children) |
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) for children |
Administrative data |
Not reported by author |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIC receipt | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 91.00 | % = 91.00 | = 0.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| WIC receipt | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 68.00 | % = 71.00 | = -3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Adult education | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 23.00 | % = 21.00 | = 2.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Adult education | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 22.00 | % = 21.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Child has insurance coverage | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 children | % = 84.20 | % = 87.20 | = -3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.15 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | footnote55This study was assigned a moderate rating for this outcome due to statistically significant differences between the program and comparison groups at baseline. |
| Child has insurance coverage | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 children | % = 82.40 | % = 84.00 | = -1.60 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Child support enforcement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 10.00 | % = 16.00 | = -6.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.33 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
|
| Child support enforcement | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 14.00 | % = 12.00 | = 2.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.11 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Emergency food | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 13.00 | % = 9.00 | = 4.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.25 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | footnote61In contrast to the study-reported results, HomVEE calculations showed this difference to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The HomVEE tests of statistical significance are based on the HomVEE calculated effect sizes, whereas authors may have used other techniques to determine statistical significance, such as regression models or analyses of variance (ANOVA). |
| Emergency food | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 11.00 | % = 8.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 59.00 | % = 58.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Food stamps | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 43.00 | % = 44.00 | = -1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Homeless shelter | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 2.00 | % = 1.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.43 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Homeless shelter | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 1.00 | % = 1.00 | = 0.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Legal aid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 7.00 | % = 6.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.10 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Legal aid | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 7.00 | % = 4.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.36 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Mother earned HS degree or currently enrolled | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 64.00 | % = 61.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.08 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Mother earned HS degree or currently enrolled | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 58.00 | % = 59.00 | = -1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Mother attended school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 43.00 | % = 40.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Mother attended school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 37.00 | % = 28.00 | = 9.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.25 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
|
| Mother worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 49.00 | % = 49.00 | = 0.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Mother worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 69.00 | % = 70.00 | = -1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Section 8 housing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 8.00 | % = 11.00 | = -3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.21 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | footnote61In contrast to the study-reported results, HomVEE calculations showed this difference to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The HomVEE tests of statistical significance are based on the HomVEE calculated effect sizes, whereas authors may have used other techniques to determine statistical significance, such as regression models or analyses of variance (ANOVA). |
| Section 8 housing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 10.00 | % = 7.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.24 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Someone in household worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 74.00 | % = 71.00 | = 3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Someone in household worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 84.00 | % = 83.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Use of respite care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 3.00 | % = 1.00 | = 2.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.68 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Use of respite care | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 2.00 | % = 1.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.43 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Welfare receipt | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 435 families | % = 62.00 | % = 63.00 | = -1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | |
| Welfare receipt | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 3 | Full sample, San Diego trial | 412 families | % = 43.00 | % = 46.00 | = -3.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
WIC receipt |
Percentage of families who received WIC | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Adult education |
Percentage of parents who received adult education or job training | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Child has insurance coverage |
Percentage of children who had health insurance coverage |
Parent/caregiver report |
Not applicable |
Child support enforcement |
Percentage of families who received child support enforcement assistance | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Emergency food |
Percentage of families who received emergency food assistance | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Food stamps |
Percentage of families who received food stamps | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Homeless shelter |
Percentage of families who received homeless shelter services | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Legal aid |
Percentage of families who received legal aid | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Mother earned high school degree or currently enrolled |
Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school degree or who were currently enrolled in school | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Mother attended school |
Percentage of mothers who were attending school | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Mother worked |
Percentage of mothers who were employed | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Section 8 housing |
Percentage of families who received Section 8 housing assistance | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Someone in household worked |
Percentage of families in which a household member was employed | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Use of respite care |
Percentage of families who used respite care | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Welfare receipt |
Percentage of families who received AFDC | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Job training or employment |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
6 months |
HFA vs. comparison group, Arizona, full sample |
199 mothers | Unadjusted proportion = 0.49 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.52 | Mean difference = -0.03 | Study reported = 0.09 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.54 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Job training or employment |
Received job training or employment by follow-up |
Parent/caregiver report |
Not reported by author |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother earned HS degree or in school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, Hawaii trial | 564 mothers | % = 81.00 | % = 80.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Mother earned HS degree or in school | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 2 | Full sample, Hawaii trial | 567 mothers | % = 82.00 | % = 81.00 | = 1.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.04 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Someone in household worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, Hawaii trial | 564 mothers | % = 68.00 | % = 70.00 | = -2.00 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.06 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Someone in household worked | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 2 | Full sample, Hawaii trial | 567 mothers | % = 77.00 | % = 75.00 | = 2.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Mother earned high school degree or in school |
Percentage of mothers who had earned a high school degree or who were currently enrolled in school | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Someone in household worked |
Percentage of families in which a household member was employed | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of days on TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 176.10 | Unadjusted mean = 169.60 | Mean difference = 6.50 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.51 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Number of days on SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 475.10 | Unadjusted mean = 461.20 | Mean difference = 13.90 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.05 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.20 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Number of days with child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 19.50 | Unadjusted mean = 19.80 | Mean difference = -0.30 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.92 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Percentage ever received TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted proportion = 0.42 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.41 | Mean difference = 0.01 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.56 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Percentage ever received child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.11 | Mean difference = -0.01 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.04 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.33 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Percentage ever received SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted proportion = 0.85 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.82 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.10 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Number of days on TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Total number of days receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Number of days on SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Total number of days receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Number of days with child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Total number of days receiving child care subsidies or benefits (for the full sample, including those not receiving) from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Percentage ever received TANF, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Percentage of mothers who were enrolled in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Percentage ever received child care subsidy, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Percentage of mothers who received a child care subsidy or benefit at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Percentage ever received SNAP, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Percentage of mothers who were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
158
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School or training for mother | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
12 months | Arizona sample | 171 mothers | Mean % = 35.20 | Mean % = 6.80 | Mean difference = 0.28 | HomeVEE calculated = 1.19 | Statistically significant, p = 0.01 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
School or training for mother |
A measure of whether the participant had enrolled and was attending training or school for advancement | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Findings rated moderate
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample |
2707 parents | Percent = 0.84 | Percent = 0.84 | Odds ratio = 1.03 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.77 |
Effect size based on study ORHomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio. |
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (parents) |
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years |
Oregon, 2010-2012, full sample |
2707 parents | Days = 381.40 | Days = 380.10 | Mean difference = 1.30 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.00 | Not statistically significant, p= 0.62 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan | Percent of parents ever enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) |
Administrative data |
Not reported by author |
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (parents) |
Total number of days enrolled in Oregon Health Plan (OHP) for parent |
Administrative data |
Not reported by author |
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child has health insurance | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY Trial | 1061 children | % = 93.90 | % = 90.40 | = 3.50 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.30 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
| Education appropriate for age | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY trial | 1061 families | % = 57.50 | % = 60.30 | = -2.80 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.07 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
| Family received TANF | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY trial | 1061 families | % = 35.00 | % = 30.40 | = 4.60 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.13 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Family received WIC | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY trial | 1061 families | % = 74.80 | % = 72.20 | = 2.60 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.08 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Family received 50% income from work | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY trial | 1061 families | % = 51.20 | % = 56.60 | = -5.40 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.13 | Not statistically significant, p > 0.05 |
| Mother employed | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY trial | 1061 families | % = 40.80 | % = 47.60 | = 6.80 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.17 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
| Mother has health insurance | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 1 | Full sample, NY Trial | 1061 mothers | % (adjusted) = 80.10 | Adjusted mean % = 78.40 | = 1.70 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Child has health insurance |
Percentage of children who had health insurance coverage |
Parent/caregiver report |
Not applicable |
Family received WIC |
Percentage of families who received WIC | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Family received TANF |
Percentage of households that received TANF | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Family received 50% income from work |
Percentage of households in which 50% of the household’s income came from work | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Mother employed |
Percentage of mothers who were employed | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Mother has health insurance |
Percentage of mothers who had health insurance coverage |
Parent/caregiver report |
Not applicable |
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased education by year or more since baseline | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Program group families not affected by substance abuse, NY Best Beginnings trial |
512 families | % = 18.40 | % = 7.40 | OR = 2.50 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.63 | Statistically significant, p < 0.05 |
|
| Receipt of public assistance | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
24 months | Program group families not affected by substance abuse, NY Best Beginnings trial |
512 families | Not available | Not available | Beta = 0.02 | Not available | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 | footnote62Study reports results using a standardized partial regression coefficient. |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Receipt of public assistance |
Percentage of households receiving public assistance | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of days with employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted mean = 98.90 | Unadjusted mean = 94.40 | Mean difference = 4.50 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.53 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
| Percentage ever received employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years | Oregon, 2010-2012 | 2707 mothers | Unadjusted proportion = 0.31 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.30 | Mean difference = 0.00 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.01 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.77 | footnote318Statistical significance is based on <abbr title="Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness">HomVEE</abbr> calculations. |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Number of days with employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Total number of days receiving employment services provided through the Oregon Department of Human Services (primarily related to TANF program), at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Percentage ever received employment services, intent-to-treat analysis, unadjusted |
Percentage of mothers who received employment services provided through the Oregon Department of Human Services (primarily related to TANF program), at any time from enrollment to two years after enrollment. | Administrative records | Not applicable |
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completed at least 1 year of college - 2 years | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years post enrollment | MA sample | 604 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | OR = 1.92 | HomeVEE calculated = 0.39 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
| High school diploma or equivalent - 2 years | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2 years post enrollment | MA sample | 604 mothers | Not reported | Not reported | OR = 0.87 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.08 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.52 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Completed at least 1 year of college - 2 years |
Percentage of mothers whose highest level of education at the 2-year follow-up was completion of at least 1 year of college | Mother self-report | Not reported |
High school diploma or equivalent - 2 years |
Percentage of mothers whose highest level of education at the 2-year follow-up was completion of high school or equivalent | Mother self-report | Not reported |
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household income above poverty level | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 2 | Biological mothers with custody of index child at interview, Alaska trial | 249 mothers | % = 55.00 | % = 56.00 | OR = 0.97 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
| Household member employed | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Year 2 | Biological mothers with custody of index child at interview, Alaska trial | 249 mothers | % = 86.00 | % = 87.00 | OR = 0.90 | HomeVEE calculated = -0.05 | Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05 |
Show outcome measure summary
| Outcome measure | Outcome measure description | Collection method | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
Household income above poverty level |
Percentage of households with incomes below the poverty level | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |
Household member employed |
Percentage of households where at least one household member was employed | Parent/caregiver report | Not applicable |