Model effectiveness research reports

HomVEE reviews the evidence of effectiveness for specific early childhood home visiting models. On this page, links to models lead to a brief model description and an overview of review results. The results include evidence of model effectiveness, a count of manuscripts from well-designed studies, and a summary of findings by outcome domain. (HomVEE uses the term well-designed impact studies to refer to those whose designs and execution suggest that some or all of the findings were due to the home visiting model rather than other factors.) Rows are highlighted in green if the model meets the HHS criteria for an evidence-based model.

Please read the home visiting model effects page for a summary across models.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 50 Models
Model
Meets HHS criteria
Maunscripts
about
well-designed
research
Last
updated
Model:

Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-47 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child development and school readiness, Child health, Positive parenting practices

Meets HHS Criteria:

Yes, Meets HHS Criteria

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
12
Last updated:
2020
Model:

Child First

Population served: Pregnant women, 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-47 months, 48+ months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child development and school readiness, Linkages and referrals, Maternal health

Meets HHS Criteria:

Yes, Meets HHS Criteria

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
1
Last updated:
2011
Model:

Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

Population served: Pregnant women, 0-11 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child development and school readiness, Maternal health

Meets HHS Criteria:

No

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
1
Last updated:
2012
Model:

Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Positive parenting practices

Meets HHS Criteria:

No

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
2
Last updated:
2012
Model:

Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Maternal health

Meets HHS Criteria:

No

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
1
Last updated:
2012
Model:

Early Head Start Home-Based Option

Population served: Pregnant women, 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child development and school readiness, Family economic self-sufficiency, Linkages and referrals, Maternal health, Positive parenting practices

Meets HHS Criteria:

Yes, Meets HHS Criteria

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
7
Last updated:
2016
Model:

Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers

Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.

Population served: Pregnant women, 0-11 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child health, Family economic self-sufficiency

Meets HHS Criteria:

Yes, Meets HHS Criteria

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
4
Last updated:
2011
Model:

Early Start (New Zealand)

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-47 months, 48+ months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Child development and school readiness, Child health, Positive parenting practices, Reductions in child maltreatment

Meets HHS Criteria:

Yes, Meets HHS Criteria

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
1
Last updated:
2011
Model:

Early Steps to School Success™—Home Visiting

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Not applicable

Meets HHS Criteria:

No

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
0
Last updated:
2019
Model:

Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

Implementation support is not currently available for the model as reviewed.

Population served: 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 24-35 months, 36-47 months, 48+ months

Favorable results from well-designed research: Not applicable - no studies met criteria to be reviewed

Meets HHS Criteria:

No

Manuscripts about well-designed research:
No eligible studies
Last updated:
2011