Research database

Displaying 1961 - 1970 of 2285
Smith, S. (1995). Two-generation programs: A new intervention strategy and directions for future research. In P.L. Chase-Landsdale & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Escape from poverty: What makes a difference for children? (pp. 299-314). New York: Cambridge U Press.
Model(s) reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)
Rating: Does not pass screens

Smith, S. A., & Moore, E. J. (2009). Validity and reliability of the parental functional health literacy measures (FHLM). Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Smith, S. C., Schetzina, K. E., Polaha, J., Baker, K., & Wood, D. (2016). The family check-up in a pediatric clinic and behavior in the home environment. In I. L. Rubin & J. Merrick (Eds.), Environmental health disparities: Costs and benefits of breaking the cycle (pp. 127–137). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens

Smyth, S., & Anderson, G. (2014). Family Nurse Partnership: Meeting the needs of teenage mothers. British Journal of Midwifery, 22(12), 870–875.

Model(s) reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Solchany, J. E., & Barnard, K. (2001). Is mom's mind on her baby?: Infant mental health in Early Head Start. Zero to Three, 22(1), 39-47.
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Does not pass screens

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797–809. Study 2.

Model(s) reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)
Rating: Low

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797-809. Study 1. 

Model(s) reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)
Rating: Low

Sonuga‐Barke, E. J., Thompson, M., Daley, D., & Laver‐Bradbury, C. (2004). Parent training for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is it as effective when delivered as routine rather than as specialist care? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 449–457.

Model(s) reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)
Rating: Low
Spaid, W. M., & Fraser, M. (1991). The correlates of Success/Failure in brief and intensive family treatment: Implications for family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 13(1-2), 77-99.
Model(s) reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Rating: Does not pass screens

Spieker, S. J., Oxford, M. L., & Fleming, C. B. (2014). Permanency outcomes for toddlers in child welfare two years after a randomized trial of a parenting intervention. Children & Youth Services Review, 44, 201-206.

Model(s) reviewed: Promoting First Relationships®—Home Visiting Intervention Model
Rating: High