Research database

Displaying 1 - 10 of 65
Anisfeld, E., Sandy, J., & Guterman, N. B. (2004). Best Beginnings: A randomized controlled trial of a paraprofessional home visiting program: Technical report. Report to the Smith Richardson Foundation and New York State Office of Children and Family Services. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work.
Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Rating: Moderate
Barlow, A., Mullany, B., Neault, N., Compton, S., Carter, A., Hastings, R., Billy, T., CohoMescal, V., Lorenzo, S., & Walkup, J. T. (Jan 2013). Effect of a paraprofessional home-visiting intervention on American Indian teen mothers’ and infants’ behavioral risks: A randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 83-93.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Spirit®
Rating: High
Barlow, A., Mullany, B., Neault, N., Goklish, N., Billy, T., Hastings, R., ... Walkup, J. T. (2015). Paraprofessional-delivered home-visiting intervention for American Indian teen mothers and children: 3-Year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(2), 154-162.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Spirit®
Rating: High
Barnes, J., Senior, R., & MacPherson, K. (2009). The utility of volunteer home-visiting support to prevent maternal depression in the first year of life. Child: Care, Health & Development, 35(6), 807-816. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01007.x
Model(s) reviewed: Home-Start
Rating: Moderate

Barnet, B., Rapp, T., DeVoe, M., & Mullins, C. D. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of a motivational intervention to reduce rapid repeated childbearing in high-risk adolescent mothers: A rebirth of economic and policy considerations. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(4), 370-376.

Model(s) reviewed: CAMI+ , Computer-Assisted Motivational Intervention (CAMI)
Rating: High
Barth, R. P. (1991). An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 15(4), 363-75.
Model(s) reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)
Rating: Moderate

Campbell, K. I., & Silva, P. A. (1997). Parents as first teachers pilot programme evaluation : Age three assessments. Final report to the ministry of education on the Dunedin and Gisborne/East coast areas. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Model(s) reviewed: Parents as First Teachers (New Zealand)
Rating: Moderate

Carta, J. J., Lefever, J. B., Bigelow, K., Borkowski, J., & Warren, S. F. (2013). Randomized trial of a cellular-phone enhanced home visitation parenting intervention. Pediatrics, 132(2), S167–S173.

Model(s) reviewed: SafeCare/Cellular Phone Enhanced Planned Activities Training Module , SafeCare/Planned Activities Training Module
Rating: High

Chazan-Cohen, R., Raikes, H. H., & Vogel, C. (2013). V. Program subgroups: Patterns of impacts for home-based, center-based, and mixed-approach programs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(1), 93-109.

Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start Home-Based Option
Rating: High

Chomos, J. C., Evans, W. P., Bolan, M., Merritt, L., Meyer, A., & Novins, D. K. (2018). Using single-case design to evaluate components of tribal home-visitation programs: Tribal community two. Infant Mental Health Journal, 39(3), 335-346.

Model(s) reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Rating: High