Skip Navigation

Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC)

In Brief

Last Updated

May 2013

Top

Evidence of Program Model Effectiveness

This program model does not meet the criteria established by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for an “evidence-based early childhood home visiting service delivery model” for the general population or for tribal populations.

Top

Program Model Description

Implemented in Australia, Mothers’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC) aimed to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) and depression and improve mothers’ health, well-being, and attachment to their children. It targeted women who were pregnant or had a child age 5 or younger and reported experiencing IPV or psychosocial distress. The program included 12 months of weekly home visits and regular telephone calls with nonprofessional peer mothers, known as mentor mothers. Mentor mothers provided safety and self-care strategies, parenting support, and information and referrals for community resources (including family violence services). For more information, please read the Program Model Overview.

Top

Extent of Evidence

Results of Search and ReviewNumber of Studies
Released from 1979 to 2012 3
Eligible for review 1
     Rated high 0
     Rated moderate 0
     Rated low 1
     Additional sourcesa 0

aAdditional sources overlap with another study and are not rated.

For more information, see the study database. For more information on the criteria used to determine the study ratings, please read Producing Study Ratings.

Top

Summary of Findings

Please read Describing Effects for more information on these categories. Only results from studies that meet the standards for the high or moderate ratings are included above.

Top

Criteria Established by the Department of Health and Human Services

Information Based on Comprehensive Review of All High- and Moderate-Impact Studies for this Model
High- or moderate-quality impact study? No
Across high- or moderate-quality studies, favorable impacts in…
 
   at least two outcome domains within one sample
 
   OR
 
   the same domain for at least two non-overlapping samples?
NA
Favorable impacts on full sample? NA
Any favorable impacts on outcome measures sustained at least 12 months after program enrollment?a NA
One or more favorable, statistically significant impact reported in a peer-reviewed journal?a NA

NA = not applicable.

aThis information is reported for all program models, but the requirements for sustained findings and inclusion in a peer-reviewed journal only apply to models for which all findings are from randomized controlled trials.

Please read the DHHS Criteria for Evidence-Based Program Models for more information.

Top