Skip Navigation

Publications

Tribal Home Visiting

Assessing the Research on Home Visiting Program Models Implemented in Tribal Communities Part 1: Evidence of Effectiveness

September 2017

A portion of the federal funds that support home visiting for mothers and families with young children are designated specifically for supporting home visiting in tribal communities. Therefore, policymakers and program administrators need to know what research has learned about home visiting in these communities. To assess the evidence of effectiveness of models that have been implemented in tribal communities, HomVEE conducted a targeted systematic review. The review included studies of home visiting program models implemented in tribal communities. Part 1 of this report describes the review process and findings, descriptive information about the program models evaluated, and summary conclusions about effectiveness. The review was originally released in February 2011; the updated version includes results through the 2016 review.

PDFDownload report
File size =1MB

Assessing the Research on Home Visiting Program Models Implemented in Tribal Communities Part 2: Lessons Learned about Implementation and Evaluation

September 2017

A portion of the federal funds that support home visiting for mothers and families with young children are designated specifically for supporting home visiting in tribal communities. Therefore, policymakers and program administrators need to know what research has learned about home visiting in these communities. To assess the evidence of effectiveness of models that have been implemented in tribal communities, HomVEE conducted a targeted systematic review. The review included studies of home visiting program models implemented in tribal communities. Part 2 of this report describes key lessons learned from home visiting models implemented in tribal communities, including gaps in the research literature that create challenges for assessing effectiveness and suggestions for strengthening future research in this area. The review was originally released in February 2011; the updated version includes results through the 2016 review.

PDFDownload report
File size =452 KB
Top